Enucleation of submucosal tumors of the esophagus: Minimally invasive versus open approach

B. H.A. Von Rahden, H. J. Stein, H. Feussner, J. R. Siewert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

109 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Surgical enucleation of submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the esophagus (mostly leiomyomas) is indicated when either the tumors are symptomatic or their biological behavior is unclear. The classic approach is a thoracotomy, but tumor enucleation can now also be performed via thoracoscopy or, for distal tumors, via laparoscopy. Methods: We assessed our experience with the different approaches in a total of 25 patients (n = 13 minimally invasive approach and n = 12 open surgery). Enucleation of the SMT was the basic surgical principle; the choice of the approach was based on the preference of the surgeon. Results: Compared to open surgery, the minimally invasive approach reduced pulmonary complications, hospital stay, and postoperative wound-related pain. The operating time was the same for both approaches. Conclusion: Minimally invasive approaches are suitable for the surgical enucleation of submucosal esophageal tumors. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic techniques are recommended as standard procedures in experienced centers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)924-930
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Enucleation
  • Laparoscopy
  • Leiomyoma
  • Submucosal tumors of the esophagus
  • Thoracoscopy
  • Thoracotomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enucleation of submucosal tumors of the esophagus: Minimally invasive versus open approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this