TY - JOUR
T1 - Entrained flow gasification-based biomass-to-X processes
T2 - A techno-economic assessment
AU - Dieterich, Vincent
AU - Hanel, Andreas
AU - Bastek, Sebastian
AU - Spliethoff, Hartmut
AU - Fendt, Sebastian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - In the pursuit of a successful energy transition, synthetic basic chemicals and fuels, alongside renewable energies, play pivotal roles. This study focuses on the utilization of biomass as a carbon source to replace conventional fossil feedstocks, conducting detailed process simulations and techno-economic analyses for various biomass-to-x pathways. Six key products—Methanol, Dimethyl Ether, Methane (SNG), Fischer-Tropsch syncrude, Hydrogen, and Ammonia—derived from entrained flow gasification of a representative biomass are systematically compared. The uniformity of simulation detail and economic methodology enables a direct and comprehensive comparison of these products. Notably, carbon-based products exhibit up to 34% lower average investment costs compared to their hydrogen-based counterparts, namely ammonia and hydrogen. This cost discrepancy is reflected in the levelized costs of manufacturing, with hydrogen-based products emerging as the most energy-expensive. The analysis identifies variable costs as the primary contributor to overall costs with around 50%, followed by fixed investment. The study underscores the critical impact of full load hours, plant lifetime, and feedstock costs on results. This emphasise the importance of detailed planning if alternative feedstock is used to balance fuel costs and enhance plant availability. Among the evaluated products, methanol emerges as the most promising across the evaluated KPIs with costs of 283.48 € MWh−1. However, regarding hydrogen-based products, it is suggested that, especially in the context of CO2 abatement costs, a comprehensive consideration of the long-term system effects is essential to prevent misinvestments during the early stages of the energy transition. This emphasizes the need for strategic planning to ensure a sustainable and economically viable shift towards biomass-derived synthetic fuels.
AB - In the pursuit of a successful energy transition, synthetic basic chemicals and fuels, alongside renewable energies, play pivotal roles. This study focuses on the utilization of biomass as a carbon source to replace conventional fossil feedstocks, conducting detailed process simulations and techno-economic analyses for various biomass-to-x pathways. Six key products—Methanol, Dimethyl Ether, Methane (SNG), Fischer-Tropsch syncrude, Hydrogen, and Ammonia—derived from entrained flow gasification of a representative biomass are systematically compared. The uniformity of simulation detail and economic methodology enables a direct and comprehensive comparison of these products. Notably, carbon-based products exhibit up to 34% lower average investment costs compared to their hydrogen-based counterparts, namely ammonia and hydrogen. This cost discrepancy is reflected in the levelized costs of manufacturing, with hydrogen-based products emerging as the most energy-expensive. The analysis identifies variable costs as the primary contributor to overall costs with around 50%, followed by fixed investment. The study underscores the critical impact of full load hours, plant lifetime, and feedstock costs on results. This emphasise the importance of detailed planning if alternative feedstock is used to balance fuel costs and enhance plant availability. Among the evaluated products, methanol emerges as the most promising across the evaluated KPIs with costs of 283.48 € MWh−1. However, regarding hydrogen-based products, it is suggested that, especially in the context of CO2 abatement costs, a comprehensive consideration of the long-term system effects is essential to prevent misinvestments during the early stages of the energy transition. This emphasizes the need for strategic planning to ensure a sustainable and economically viable shift towards biomass-derived synthetic fuels.
KW - Biomass-to-X
KW - Entrained flow gasification
KW - Process simulation
KW - Techno-economic analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182504787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118061
DO - 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118061
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85182504787
SN - 0196-8904
VL - 301
JO - Energy Conversion and Management
JF - Energy Conversion and Management
M1 - 118061
ER -