Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enteral nutrition prolongs delayed gastric emptying in patients after whipple resection

  • Marcus E. Martignoni
  • , Helmut Friess
  • , Florian Sell
  • , Lars Ricken
  • , Shailesh Shrikhande
  • , Christoph Kulli
  • , Markus W. Büchler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

124 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying is one of the most frequent postoperative complications after Whipple resection. In the present study we evaluated the role of enteral nutrition in the development of delayed gastric emptying after Whipple resection. PATIENTS and METHODS: Between January 1996 and June 1998, 64 patients (30 female, 34 male) underwent a classic (n = 27) or pylorus-preserving (n = 37) Whipple resection. Two patients were excluded; 30 patients received enteral and 32 patients received no-enteral nutrition. RESULTS: Delayed gastric emptying occurred significantly more in patients with enteral (17 of 30, 57%) than in patients with no-enteral nutrition (5 of 32, 16%) (P < 0.01). Consequently, patients in the enteral nutrition group had a nasogastric tube for a significantly (P < 0.01) longer period and had a significantly (P < 0.01) longer hospital stay than patients in the no-enteral nutrition group. There were no differences in the frequency of occurrence of other postoperative complications between patients with enteral and no-enteral nutrition. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing a Whipple resection, enteral nutrition is associated with a higher frequency of delayed gastric emptying with no advantages regarding other postoperative complications and should therefore be restricted to specific indications. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-23
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume180
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enteral nutrition prolongs delayed gastric emptying in patients after whipple resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this