TY - JOUR
T1 - Engineering Students' Thinking About Technical Systems
T2 - An Ontological Categories Approach
AU - Hofer, Sarah Isabelle
AU - Reinhold, Frank
AU - Loch, Frieder
AU - Vogel-Heuser, Birgit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 Hofer, Reinhold, Loch and Vogel-Heuser.
PY - 2020/5/29
Y1 - 2020/5/29
N2 - This paper aims at identifying ontological categories as higher-order knowledge structures that underlie engineering students' thinking about technical systems. Derived from interviews, these ontological categories include, inter alia, a focus on the behavior, structure, or purpose of a technical system. We designed and administered a paper-based test to assess these ontological categories in a sample of N = 340 first-year students in different engineering disciplines. Based on their activation patterns across ontological categories, students clustered into six different ontological profiles. Study program, gender as well as objective and self-perceived cognitive abilities were associated with differences in jointly activated ontological categories. Additional idiosyncratic influences and experiences, however, seemed to play a more important role. Our results can inform university instruction and support successful co-operation in engineering.
AB - This paper aims at identifying ontological categories as higher-order knowledge structures that underlie engineering students' thinking about technical systems. Derived from interviews, these ontological categories include, inter alia, a focus on the behavior, structure, or purpose of a technical system. We designed and administered a paper-based test to assess these ontological categories in a sample of N = 340 first-year students in different engineering disciplines. Based on their activation patterns across ontological categories, students clustered into six different ontological profiles. Study program, gender as well as objective and self-perceived cognitive abilities were associated with differences in jointly activated ontological categories. Additional idiosyncratic influences and experiences, however, seemed to play a more important role. Our results can inform university instruction and support successful co-operation in engineering.
KW - cluster analysis
KW - conceptual knowledge
KW - engineering education
KW - higher education
KW - ontologies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089342697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2020.00066
DO - 10.3389/feduc.2020.00066
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089342697
SN - 2504-284X
VL - 5
JO - Frontiers in Education
JF - Frontiers in Education
M1 - 66
ER -