Ein Vergleich von Direktaufnahmen mit Verlegungen von psychiatrischen Stationen im Rahmen von Stationsäquivalenter Behandlung (StäB)

Peter Brieger; Luisa Klocke; Andreas Bechdolf; Sebastian Von Peter; Gerhard Längle; Martin Holzke; Konstantinos Nikolaidis; Reinhold Kilian; Jürgen Timm; Stefan Weinmann; Tamara Waldmann; Johanna Zur Verth; Svenja Raschmann; Julian Schwarz; Sandeep Rout; Constance Hirschmeier; Uwe Herwig; Janina Richter; Johanna Baumgardt; Johannes Hamann

doi:10.1055/a-2477-3639

Ein Vergleich von Direktaufnahmen mit Verlegungen von psychiatrischen Stationen im Rahmen von Stationsäquivalenter Behandlung (StäB)

Translated title of the contribution: A comparison of direct admissions to inpatient-equivalent home treatment with transfers from psychiatric wards

Peter Brieger
, Luisa Klocke
, Andreas Bechdolf
, Sebastian Von Peter
, Gerhard Längle
, Martin Holzke
, Konstantinos Nikolaidis
, Reinhold Kilian
, Jürgen Timm
, Stefan Weinmann
, Tamara Waldmann
, Johanna Zur Verth
, Svenja Raschmann
, Julian Schwarz
, Sandeep Rout
, Constance Hirschmeier
, Uwe Herwig
, Janina Richter
, Johanna Baumgardt
, Johannes Hamann

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Deutsches Zentrum für Psychische Gesundheit (DZPG)
Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf
University Hospital Brandenburg
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Zwiefalten
University of Tübingen
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
University of Ulm
University of Bremen
Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel (UPK)
Klinikum Neukölln
Universitat Konstanz
University Hospital of Psychiatry
Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO)
Bezirksklinikum Mainkofen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined. Methods Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis. Results Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects. Conclusion Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.

Translated title of the contribution	A comparison of direct admissions to inpatient-equivalent home treatment with transfers from psychiatric wards
Original language	German
Pages (from-to)	129-134
Number of pages	6
Journal	Psychiatrische Praxis
Volume	52
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2477-3639
State	Published - 20 Dec 2024
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1055/a-2477-3639

Cite this

Brieger, P., Klocke, L., Bechdolf, A., Von Peter, S., Längle, G., Holzke, M., Nikolaidis, K., Kilian, R., Timm, J., Weinmann, S., Waldmann, T., Zur Verth, J., Raschmann, S., Schwarz, J., Rout, S., Hirschmeier, C., Herwig, U., Richter, J., Baumgardt, J., & Hamann, J. (2024). Ein Vergleich von Direktaufnahmen mit Verlegungen von psychiatrischen Stationen im Rahmen von Stationsäquivalenter Behandlung (StäB). Psychiatrische Praxis, 52(3), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2477-3639

@article{679131e161c545a9b1c77af38b2ce946,

title = "Ein Vergleich von Direktaufnahmen mit Verlegungen von psychiatrischen Stationen im Rahmen von Stations{\"a}quivalenter Behandlung (St{\"a}B)",

abstract = "Aim Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined. Methods Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis. Results Of 200 St{\"a}B users, 144 (72\%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28\%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects. Conclusion Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.",

keywords = "health services research, home treatment, mental health",

author = "Peter Brieger and Luisa Klocke and Andreas Bechdolf and \{Von Peter\}, Sebastian and Gerhard L{\"a}ngle and Martin Holzke and Konstantinos Nikolaidis and Reinhold Kilian and J{\"u}rgen Timm and Stefan Weinmann and Tamara Waldmann and \{Zur Verth\}, Johanna and Svenja Raschmann and Julian Schwarz and Sandeep Rout and Constance Hirschmeier and Uwe Herwig and Janina Richter and Johanna Baumgardt and Johannes Hamann",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024. The Author(s).",

year = "2024",

month = dec,

day = "20",

doi = "10.1055/a-2477-3639",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "52",

pages = "129--134",

journal = "Psychiatrische Praxis",

issn = "0303-4259",

publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",

number = "3",

}

Brieger, P, Klocke, L, Bechdolf, A, Von Peter, S, Längle, G, Holzke, M, Nikolaidis, K, Kilian, R, Timm, J, Weinmann, S, Waldmann, T, Zur Verth, J, Raschmann, S, Schwarz, J, Rout, S, Hirschmeier, C, Herwig, U, Richter, J, Baumgardt, J & Hamann, J 2024, 'Ein Vergleich von Direktaufnahmen mit Verlegungen von psychiatrischen Stationen im Rahmen von Stationsäquivalenter Behandlung (StäB)', Psychiatrische Praxis, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2477-3639

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ein Vergleich von Direktaufnahmen mit Verlegungen von psychiatrischen Stationen im Rahmen von Stationsäquivalenter Behandlung (StäB)

AU - Brieger, Peter

AU - Klocke, Luisa

AU - Bechdolf, Andreas

AU - Von Peter, Sebastian

AU - Längle, Gerhard

AU - Holzke, Martin

AU - Nikolaidis, Konstantinos

AU - Kilian, Reinhold

AU - Timm, Jürgen

AU - Weinmann, Stefan

AU - Waldmann, Tamara

AU - Zur Verth, Johanna

AU - Raschmann, Svenja

AU - Schwarz, Julian

AU - Rout, Sandeep

AU - Hirschmeier, Constance

AU - Herwig, Uwe

AU - Richter, Janina

AU - Baumgardt, Johanna

AU - Hamann, Johannes

PY - 2024/12/20

Y1 - 2024/12/20

N2 - Aim Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined. Methods Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis. Results Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects. Conclusion Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.

AB - Aim Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined. Methods Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis. Results Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects. Conclusion Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.

KW - health services research

KW - home treatment

KW - mental health

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214645071

U2 - 10.1055/a-2477-3639

DO - 10.1055/a-2477-3639

M3 - Artikel

C2 - 39706215

AN - SCOPUS:85214645071

SN - 0303-4259

VL - 52

SP - 129

EP - 134

JO - Psychiatrische Praxis

JF - Psychiatrische Praxis

IS - 3

ER -

Ein Vergleich von Direktaufnahmen mit Verlegungen von psychiatrischen Stationen im Rahmen von Stationsäquivalenter Behandlung (StäB)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this