TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of glatiramer acetate in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder
T2 - a multicenter retrospective study
AU - Ayzenberg, Ilya
AU - Schöllhammer, Joanna
AU - Hoepner, Robert
AU - Hellwig, Kerstin
AU - Ringelstein, Marius
AU - Aktas, Orhan
AU - Kümpfel, Tania
AU - Krumbholz, Markus
AU - Trebst, Corinna
AU - Paul, Friedemann
AU - Pache, Florence
AU - Obermann, Mark
AU - Zeltner, Lena
AU - Schwab, Matthias
AU - Berthele, Achim
AU - Jarius, Sven
AU - Kleiter, Ingo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Glatiramer acetate (GA) is an approved therapy for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, but its efficacy for the prevention of attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remains unknown. We did a multicenter retrospective analysis of GA-treated patients with NMOSD, identified through a national registry. Annualized relapse rate and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were the main outcome measures. We identified 23 GA-treated patients (21 female, 16 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive). GA was given for <6 months in seven patients; reasons for stopping were relapses (n = 3), confirmation of NMOSD (n = 2) and side effects (n = 2). Of 16 patients treated ≥6 months with GA (15 female, 11 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive), 14 experienced at least one relapse. There was no reduction in the mean annualized relapse rate in the total group (1.9 ± 1.1 before vs. 1.8 ± 1.4 during GA therapy), as well as in those patients who were aquaporin-4 antibody-positive, or had a history of prior immunotherapy or not. The median EDSS increased (2.5 start vs. 3.5 finish of GA, P < 0.05). GA therapy was discontinued in 15/16 patients; reasons were therapeutic inefficacy in 13 and post-injection skin reactions in two patients. We conclude that GA is not beneficial for preventing attacks in most patients with NMOSD, particularly in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive cases.
AB - Glatiramer acetate (GA) is an approved therapy for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, but its efficacy for the prevention of attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remains unknown. We did a multicenter retrospective analysis of GA-treated patients with NMOSD, identified through a national registry. Annualized relapse rate and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were the main outcome measures. We identified 23 GA-treated patients (21 female, 16 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive). GA was given for <6 months in seven patients; reasons for stopping were relapses (n = 3), confirmation of NMOSD (n = 2) and side effects (n = 2). Of 16 patients treated ≥6 months with GA (15 female, 11 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive), 14 experienced at least one relapse. There was no reduction in the mean annualized relapse rate in the total group (1.9 ± 1.1 before vs. 1.8 ± 1.4 during GA therapy), as well as in those patients who were aquaporin-4 antibody-positive, or had a history of prior immunotherapy or not. The median EDSS increased (2.5 start vs. 3.5 finish of GA, P < 0.05). GA therapy was discontinued in 15/16 patients; reasons were therapeutic inefficacy in 13 and post-injection skin reactions in two patients. We conclude that GA is not beneficial for preventing attacks in most patients with NMOSD, particularly in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive cases.
KW - Aquaporin-4 antibody
KW - Devic’s disease
KW - Glatiramer acetate
KW - Myelitis
KW - Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder
KW - Optic neuritis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960372910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00415-015-7991-1
DO - 10.1007/s00415-015-7991-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 26810718
AN - SCOPUS:84960372910
SN - 0340-5354
VL - 263
SP - 575
EP - 582
JO - Journal of Neurology
JF - Journal of Neurology
IS - 3
ER -