Effect of spironolactone on diastolic function and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The Aldo-DHF randomized controlled trial

Frank Edelmann, Rolf Wachter, Albrecht G. Schmidt, Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer, Caterina Colantonio, Wolfram Kamke, André Duvinage, Raoul Stahrenberg, Kathleen Durstewitz, Markus Löffler, Hans Dirk Düngen, Carsten Tschöpe, Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, Martin Halle, Gerd Hasenfuss, Götz Gelbrich, Burkert Pieske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

603 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Diastolic heart failure (ie, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction) is a common condition without established therapy, and aldosterone stimulation may contribute to its progression. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of long-term aldosterone receptor blockade in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The primary objective was to determine whether spironolactone is superior to placebo in improving diastolic function and maximal exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Design and Setting: The Aldo-DHF trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between March 2007 and April 2012 at 10 sites in Germany and Austria that included 422 ambulatory patients (mean age, 67 [SD, 8] years; 52% female) with chronic New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% or greater, and evidence of diastolic dysfunction. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of spironolactone once daily (n=213) or matching placebo (n=209) with 12 months of follow-up. Main Outcome Measures: The equally ranked co-primary end points were changes in diastolic function (E/e′) on echocardiography and maximal exercise capacity (peak V̇O2) on cardiopulmonary exercise testing, both measured at 12 months. Results: Diastolic function (E/e′) decreased from 12.7 (SD, 3.6) to 12.1 (SD, 3.7) with spironolactone and increased from 12.8 (SD, 4.4) to 13.6 (SD, 4.3) with placebo (adjusted mean difference, -1.5; 95% CI, -2.0 to -0.9; P<.001). Peak V̇O2 did not significantly change with spironolactone vs placebo (from 16.3 [SD, 3.6] mL/min/kg to 16.8 [SD, 4.6] mL/min/kg and from 16.4 [SD, 3.5] mL/min/kg to 16.9 [SD, 4.4] mL/min/kg, respectively; adjusted mean difference, +0.1 mL/min/kg; 95% CI, -0.6 to +0.8 mL/min/kg; P=.81). Spironolactone induced reverse remodeling (left ventricular mass index declined; difference, -6 g/m2; 95% CI, -10 to -1 g/m2; P=.009) and improved neuroendocrine activation (N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide geometric mean ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P=.03) but did not improve heart failure symptoms or quality of life and slightly reduced 6-minute walking distance (-15 m; 95% CI, -27 to -2 m; P=.03). Spironolactone also modestly increased serum potassium levels (+0.2 mmol/L; 95% CI, +0.1 to +0.3; P<.001) and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (-5 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI, -8 to -3 mL/min/1.73 m2; P<.001) without affecting hospitalizations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized controlled trial, long-term aldosterone receptor blockade improved left ventricular diastolic function but did not affect maximal exercise capacity, patient symptoms, or quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Whether the improved left ventricular function observed in the Aldo-DHF trial is of clinical significance requires further investigation in larger populations. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: ISRCTN94726526; Eudra-CT No: 2006-002605-31.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)781-791
Number of pages11
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume309
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of spironolactone on diastolic function and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The Aldo-DHF randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this