TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Procedural Technique on Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Implantation
AU - Ozaki, Yuichi
AU - Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
AU - Melaku, Gebremedhin D.
AU - Joner, Michael
AU - Galli, Stefano
AU - Verheye, Stefan
AU - Lee, Michael K.Y.
AU - Waksman, Ron
AU - Haude, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Background: This study sought to assess target lesion failure (TLF) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) through 1 year following second-generation drug-eluting magnesium scaffold (Magmaris) implantation using a dedicated technique (so-called “4 P's” strategy). Methods and results: The 4 P's strategy stands for: correct patient selection, proper scaffold sizing, pre-dilatation (<20% residual stenosis), post-dilatation. All the patient and lesion characteristics, preparation, and sizing of the device were compared in patients with TLF and CD-TLR through 1-year follow-up. We analyzed 315 patients for this study. At 1 year, there were 14 TLFs and 10 CD-TLRs. The TLF rates were 7.7%, 4.9%, and 4.1%; while the CD-TLR rates were 7.7%, 2.5%, and 3.2% in the undersized, properly sized, and oversized vessel groups, correspondingly. Diameter stenosis (DS) after pre-dilatation in patients with TLF and CD-TLR was significantly greater than in those without TLF and CD-TLR. In patients with a properly sized scaffold, DS after pre-dilatation was similar in patients with and without TLF and CD-TLR. However, in patients with non-properly sized scaffolds, greater post-balloon DS was observed in patients with TLF and CD-TLR. Conclusions: Improper sizing and poor lesion preparation before Magmaris implantation appear to be related to TLF during 1-year follow-up.
AB - Background: This study sought to assess target lesion failure (TLF) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) through 1 year following second-generation drug-eluting magnesium scaffold (Magmaris) implantation using a dedicated technique (so-called “4 P's” strategy). Methods and results: The 4 P's strategy stands for: correct patient selection, proper scaffold sizing, pre-dilatation (<20% residual stenosis), post-dilatation. All the patient and lesion characteristics, preparation, and sizing of the device were compared in patients with TLF and CD-TLR through 1-year follow-up. We analyzed 315 patients for this study. At 1 year, there were 14 TLFs and 10 CD-TLRs. The TLF rates were 7.7%, 4.9%, and 4.1%; while the CD-TLR rates were 7.7%, 2.5%, and 3.2% in the undersized, properly sized, and oversized vessel groups, correspondingly. Diameter stenosis (DS) after pre-dilatation in patients with TLF and CD-TLR was significantly greater than in those without TLF and CD-TLR. In patients with a properly sized scaffold, DS after pre-dilatation was similar in patients with and without TLF and CD-TLR. However, in patients with non-properly sized scaffolds, greater post-balloon DS was observed in patients with TLF and CD-TLR. Conclusions: Improper sizing and poor lesion preparation before Magmaris implantation appear to be related to TLF during 1-year follow-up.
KW - Procedure
KW - Resorbable magnesium scaffold
KW - Target lesion failure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106637279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.05.006
DO - 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.05.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 34049817
AN - SCOPUS:85106637279
SN - 1553-8389
VL - 29
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
JF - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
ER -