TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of private versus emergency medical systems transportation in trauma patients in a mostly physician based system- a retrospective multicenter study based on the TraumaRegister DGU®
AU - the TraumaRegister DGU
AU - Huber, Stephan
AU - Crönlein, Moritz
AU - von Matthey, Francesca
AU - Hanschen, Marc
AU - Seidl, Fritz
AU - Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
AU - Biberthaler, Peter
AU - Lefering, Rolf
AU - Huber-Wagner, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Huber et al.
PY - 2016/4/27
Y1 - 2016/4/27
N2 - Background: The effects of private transportation (PT) to definitive trauma care in comparison to transportation using Emergency Medical Services (EMS) have so far been addressed by a few studies, with some of them finding a beneficial effect on survival. The aim of the current study was to investigate epidemiology, pre- and in-hospital times as well as outcomes in patients after PT as compared to EMS recorded in the TraumaRegister DGU®. Methods: All patients in the database of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) from participating European trauma centers treated in 2009 to 2013 with available data on the mode of transportation, ISS≥4 and ICU treatment were included in the study. Epidemiological data, pre- and in-hospital times were analysed. Outcomes were analysed after adjustment for RISC-II scores. Results: 76,512 patients were included in the study, of which 1,085 (1.4%) were private transports. Distribution of ages and trauma mechanisms showed a markedly different pattern following PT, with more children<15years treated following PT (3.3% EMS vs. 9.6 for PT) and more elderly patients of 65years or older (26.6 vs 32.4%). Private transportation to trauma care was by far more frequent in Level 2 and 3 hospitals (41.2% in EMS group vs 73.7%). Median pre-hospital times were also reduced following PT (59min for EMS vs. 46 for PT). In-hospital time in the trauma room (66 for EMS vs. 103min for PT) and time to diagnostics were prolonged following PT. Outcome analysis after adjustment for RISC-II scores showed a survival benefit of PT over EMS transport (SMR for EMS 1.07 95% CI 1.05-1.09; for PT 0.85 95% CI 0.62-1.08). Discussion: The current study shows a distinct pattern concerning epidemiology and mechanism of injury following PT. PT accelerates the median pre-hospital times, but prolongs time to diagnostic measures and time in the trauma room. Conclusions: In this distinct collective, PT seemed to lead to a small benefit in terms of mortality, which may reflect pre-hospital times, pre-hospital interventions or other confounders.
AB - Background: The effects of private transportation (PT) to definitive trauma care in comparison to transportation using Emergency Medical Services (EMS) have so far been addressed by a few studies, with some of them finding a beneficial effect on survival. The aim of the current study was to investigate epidemiology, pre- and in-hospital times as well as outcomes in patients after PT as compared to EMS recorded in the TraumaRegister DGU®. Methods: All patients in the database of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) from participating European trauma centers treated in 2009 to 2013 with available data on the mode of transportation, ISS≥4 and ICU treatment were included in the study. Epidemiological data, pre- and in-hospital times were analysed. Outcomes were analysed after adjustment for RISC-II scores. Results: 76,512 patients were included in the study, of which 1,085 (1.4%) were private transports. Distribution of ages and trauma mechanisms showed a markedly different pattern following PT, with more children<15years treated following PT (3.3% EMS vs. 9.6 for PT) and more elderly patients of 65years or older (26.6 vs 32.4%). Private transportation to trauma care was by far more frequent in Level 2 and 3 hospitals (41.2% in EMS group vs 73.7%). Median pre-hospital times were also reduced following PT (59min for EMS vs. 46 for PT). In-hospital time in the trauma room (66 for EMS vs. 103min for PT) and time to diagnostics were prolonged following PT. Outcome analysis after adjustment for RISC-II scores showed a survival benefit of PT over EMS transport (SMR for EMS 1.07 95% CI 1.05-1.09; for PT 0.85 95% CI 0.62-1.08). Discussion: The current study shows a distinct pattern concerning epidemiology and mechanism of injury following PT. PT accelerates the median pre-hospital times, but prolongs time to diagnostic measures and time in the trauma room. Conclusions: In this distinct collective, PT seemed to lead to a small benefit in terms of mortality, which may reflect pre-hospital times, pre-hospital interventions or other confounders.
KW - Emergency department
KW - Emergency services
KW - Polytrauma
KW - Private transport
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964507545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13049-016-0252-1
DO - 10.1186/s13049-016-0252-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 27121607
AN - SCOPUS:84964507545
SN - 1757-7241
VL - 24
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 60
ER -