TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of legroom proportions and individual factors for sitting with crossed legs
T2 - implications on the interior design of automated driving vehicles
AU - Stanglmeier, Maximilian J.
AU - Schulte, Florian
AU - Schauberger, Gunther
AU - Bichler, Raphael J.
AU - Schwirtz, Ansgar
AU - Paternoster, Florian K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Sitting with crossed legs is a commonly adopted sitting posture in everyday situations. Yet, little is known about suitable design criteria to facilitate such a position inside a vehicle. This study is aimed at determining how much space is necessary for crossing the legs while considering legroom restrictions, anthropometric measures, and individual flexibility. More specifically, 3 D-kinematics of an ankle-on-knee leg-crossing task and the easiness to move ratings of 30 participants were assessed with restrictions of the legroom (2 heights × 3 distances) as well as without restrictions. Functional regression models revealed adaptations to a legroom restriction in the execution of movement, which occurred mainly in the knee joint and increased with more restricted legroom proportions. Therefore, the present study suggests a distance of 120% of the buttock–knee length between the dashboard and the occupant, as it requires only moderate adaptations and does not affect the perceived easiness of move. Practitioner Summary: This research investigated how much space is needed to cross the legs while sitting in a vehicle, finding that the movement execution is affected by legroom proportions, as well as individual anthropometry and flexibility. The study further presents the use of predicted motion traces to determine spatial requirements of movements. Abbreviations: BKL: buttock-knee length; H-point: hip point.
AB - Sitting with crossed legs is a commonly adopted sitting posture in everyday situations. Yet, little is known about suitable design criteria to facilitate such a position inside a vehicle. This study is aimed at determining how much space is necessary for crossing the legs while considering legroom restrictions, anthropometric measures, and individual flexibility. More specifically, 3 D-kinematics of an ankle-on-knee leg-crossing task and the easiness to move ratings of 30 participants were assessed with restrictions of the legroom (2 heights × 3 distances) as well as without restrictions. Functional regression models revealed adaptations to a legroom restriction in the execution of movement, which occurred mainly in the knee joint and increased with more restricted legroom proportions. Therefore, the present study suggests a distance of 120% of the buttock–knee length between the dashboard and the occupant, as it requires only moderate adaptations and does not affect the perceived easiness of move. Practitioner Summary: This research investigated how much space is needed to cross the legs while sitting in a vehicle, finding that the movement execution is affected by legroom proportions, as well as individual anthropometry and flexibility. The study further presents the use of predicted motion traces to determine spatial requirements of movements. Abbreviations: BKL: buttock-knee length; H-point: hip point.
KW - Sitting posture
KW - biomechanics
KW - ergonomics
KW - functional regression
KW - motion analysis
KW - movement space
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107544741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00140139.2021.1933201
DO - 10.1080/00140139.2021.1933201
M3 - Article
C2 - 34018909
AN - SCOPUS:85107544741
SN - 0014-0139
VL - 64
SP - 1393
EP - 1404
JO - Ergonomics
JF - Ergonomics
IS - 11
ER -