TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of fish pond drainage on turbidity, suspended solids, fine sediment deposition and nutrient concentration in receiving pearl mussel streams
AU - Hoess, Rebecca
AU - Geist, Juergen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Extensive fish production in earthen ponds is a common aquaculture practice, which requires draining of the ponds for fish harvesting. Despite their value for biodiversity and water retention, the impact of fish ponds on the receiving streams as regards fine sediment and nutrient pollution remains controversial. This holds particularly true for streams with endangered freshwater pearl mussels, requiring a highly permeable streambed with low fine sediment content for successful juvenile development. This study quantified the amount of fine sediment, suspended solids and nutrients delivered to pearl mussel streams in relation to the pond characteristics, distance to the receiving stream and applications of measures to prevent the input of fines. Comparing fine sediment deposition above and downstream of the pond inlets after 21 pond drainage operations, as well as continuous measurements of the turbidity for 12 operations revealed varying effects of pond fishing on the receiving streams. Average fine sediment deposition was increased by nearly six-fold compared to upstream and maximum turbidity values for single drainage operations exceeded 460 NTU. Draining between 1% and 92% of the water volume of individual ponds resulted in additional loading of 0.07–4.6 t suspended particles. Physical mitigation structures that prevent mobilized material from reaching the receiving stream significantly reduced the fine sediment input and deposition rates. Harvesting methods that do not require complete drainage of the pond reduced the turbidity by ten-fold. Without mitigation measures, the impact of pond drainage operations on the fine sediment deposition was comparable to high discharge events. No significant increase in nutrient concentration was observed during most drainage operations. These results reveal remarkable effects of pond drainage on the aquatic environment, as well as the possibility to minimize such impacts by switching to harvest methods that do not require complete pond drainage and installation of sedimentation structures.
AB - Extensive fish production in earthen ponds is a common aquaculture practice, which requires draining of the ponds for fish harvesting. Despite their value for biodiversity and water retention, the impact of fish ponds on the receiving streams as regards fine sediment and nutrient pollution remains controversial. This holds particularly true for streams with endangered freshwater pearl mussels, requiring a highly permeable streambed with low fine sediment content for successful juvenile development. This study quantified the amount of fine sediment, suspended solids and nutrients delivered to pearl mussel streams in relation to the pond characteristics, distance to the receiving stream and applications of measures to prevent the input of fines. Comparing fine sediment deposition above and downstream of the pond inlets after 21 pond drainage operations, as well as continuous measurements of the turbidity for 12 operations revealed varying effects of pond fishing on the receiving streams. Average fine sediment deposition was increased by nearly six-fold compared to upstream and maximum turbidity values for single drainage operations exceeded 460 NTU. Draining between 1% and 92% of the water volume of individual ponds resulted in additional loading of 0.07–4.6 t suspended particles. Physical mitigation structures that prevent mobilized material from reaching the receiving stream significantly reduced the fine sediment input and deposition rates. Harvesting methods that do not require complete drainage of the pond reduced the turbidity by ten-fold. Without mitigation measures, the impact of pond drainage operations on the fine sediment deposition was comparable to high discharge events. No significant increase in nutrient concentration was observed during most drainage operations. These results reveal remarkable effects of pond drainage on the aquatic environment, as well as the possibility to minimize such impacts by switching to harvest methods that do not require complete pond drainage and installation of sedimentation structures.
KW - Aquaculture management
KW - Environmental impacts
KW - Extensive cyprinid production
KW - Mitigation methods
KW - Retention structures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100231804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116520
DO - 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116520
M3 - Article
C2 - 33540252
AN - SCOPUS:85100231804
SN - 0269-7491
VL - 274
JO - Environmental Pollution
JF - Environmental Pollution
M1 - 116520
ER -