TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic and Environmental Prospects of Battery and Fuel Cell Vehicles for the Energy Transition in German Communities
AU - Felgenhauer, Markus F.
AU - Pellow, Matthew A.
AU - Benson, Sally M.
AU - Hamacher, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The CO2 reduction potential of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles (BEV/FCEV) is linked to the success of the energy transition. Both vehicle types can facilitate the integration of intermittent renewables. H2 generation and storage infrastructure to support FCEVs is a promising opportunity for synergy between the transportation and building sectors in renewables integration, through grid storage and Power2Gas (i.e. blending H2 into the natural gas supply). However, as FCEVs also require more than twice as much electric energy per distance traveled than BEVs, an integrated analysis is necessary to evaluate which electric vehicle (EV) offers the lowest cost for reducing CO2 emissions. We use an integrated analysis to determine the overall cost and CO2 emissions when BEVs or FCEVs are deployed in two communities in southern Germany. Based on a comprehensive scenario for future cost and technology developments for 2025 and 2035, the cost-optimal mix of energy generation and storage technologies is determined to meet all energy demands (heating, electricity and transportation) in the communities. This integrated analysis finds, that the higher energy consumption of FCEVs could not be compensated by system benefits like Power2Gas and grid storage. The result is consistent with a similar analysis of a community in California. The simulation results reveal, that while the two vehicle types enable similar CO2 emission reductions, these can be realized at lower costs with BEVs than with FCEVs. The most striking observation was, that in the event seasonal H2 grid storage becomes necessary, FCEVs would in fact be less favorable than BEVs, which require less energy per km traveled and therefore leave more energy available for stationary applications.
AB - The CO2 reduction potential of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles (BEV/FCEV) is linked to the success of the energy transition. Both vehicle types can facilitate the integration of intermittent renewables. H2 generation and storage infrastructure to support FCEVs is a promising opportunity for synergy between the transportation and building sectors in renewables integration, through grid storage and Power2Gas (i.e. blending H2 into the natural gas supply). However, as FCEVs also require more than twice as much electric energy per distance traveled than BEVs, an integrated analysis is necessary to evaluate which electric vehicle (EV) offers the lowest cost for reducing CO2 emissions. We use an integrated analysis to determine the overall cost and CO2 emissions when BEVs or FCEVs are deployed in two communities in southern Germany. Based on a comprehensive scenario for future cost and technology developments for 2025 and 2035, the cost-optimal mix of energy generation and storage technologies is determined to meet all energy demands (heating, electricity and transportation) in the communities. This integrated analysis finds, that the higher energy consumption of FCEVs could not be compensated by system benefits like Power2Gas and grid storage. The result is consistent with a similar analysis of a community in California. The simulation results reveal, that while the two vehicle types enable similar CO2 emission reductions, these can be realized at lower costs with BEVs than with FCEVs. The most striking observation was, that in the event seasonal H2 grid storage becomes necessary, FCEVs would in fact be less favorable than BEVs, which require less energy per km traveled and therefore leave more energy available for stationary applications.
KW - Power-to-Gas
KW - battery vehicles
KW - energy transition
KW - fuel cell vehicles
KW - hydrogen infrastructure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014994487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.128
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.128
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85014994487
SN - 1876-6102
VL - 99
SP - 380
EP - 391
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
T2 - 10th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference, IRES 2016
Y2 - 15 March 2016 through 17 March 2016
ER -