Abstract
We discuss a diversity measure combining information of relative abundances and taxonomic distinctiveness suggested by Ricotta (2004). We show that Ricotta's measure violates weak species monotonicity, a condition that requires that the addition of a species should always increase a diversity index if abundances change only marginally. We suggest an alternative index satisfying weak species monotonicity and apply it to the 'Zeesserveld' forest reserve in the Netherlands.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 215-217 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Diversity and Distributions |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Biodiversity indices
- Relative abundance
- Species monotonicity
- Taxonomic distinctiveness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Diversity measurement combining relative abundances and taxonomic distinctiveness of species'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver