TY - JOUR
T1 - Differentiation of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis from Secondary Peritonitis in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
T2 - Retrospective Multicentre Study
AU - Würstle, Silvia
AU - Hapfelmeier, Alexander
AU - Karapetyan, Siranush
AU - Studen, Fabian
AU - Isaakidou, Andriana
AU - Schneider, Tillman
AU - Schmid, Roland M.
AU - von Delius, Stefan
AU - Gundling, Felix
AU - Burgkart, Rainer
AU - Obermeier, Andreas
AU - Mayr, Ulrich
AU - Ringelhan, Marc
AU - Rasch, Sebastian
AU - Lahmer, Tobias
AU - Geisler, Fabian
AU - Turner, Paul E.
AU - Chan, Benjamin K.
AU - Spinner, Christoph D.
AU - Schneider, Jochen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Ascitic fluid infection is a serious complication of liver cirrhosis. The distinction between the more common spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and the less common secondary peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis is crucial due to the varying treatment approaches. This retrospective multicentre study was conducted in three German hospitals and analysed 532 SBP episodes and 37 secondary peritonitis episodes. Overall, >30 clinical, microbiological, and laboratory parameters were evaluated to identify key differentiation criteria. Microbiological characteristics in ascites followed by severity of illness and clinicopathological parameters in ascites were the most important predictors identified by a random forest model to distinguish between SBP and secondary peritonitis. To establish a point-score model, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model selected the ten most promising discriminatory features. By aiming at a sensitivity of 95% either to rule out or rule in SBP episodes, two cut-off scores were defined, dividing patients with infected ascites into a low-risk (score ≥ 45) and high-risk group (score < 25) for secondary peritonitis. Overall, the discrimination of secondary peritonitis from SBP remains challenging. Our univariable analyses, random forest model, and LASSO point score may help clinicians with the crucial differentiation between SBP and secondary peritonitis.
AB - Ascitic fluid infection is a serious complication of liver cirrhosis. The distinction between the more common spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and the less common secondary peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis is crucial due to the varying treatment approaches. This retrospective multicentre study was conducted in three German hospitals and analysed 532 SBP episodes and 37 secondary peritonitis episodes. Overall, >30 clinical, microbiological, and laboratory parameters were evaluated to identify key differentiation criteria. Microbiological characteristics in ascites followed by severity of illness and clinicopathological parameters in ascites were the most important predictors identified by a random forest model to distinguish between SBP and secondary peritonitis. To establish a point-score model, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model selected the ten most promising discriminatory features. By aiming at a sensitivity of 95% either to rule out or rule in SBP episodes, two cut-off scores were defined, dividing patients with infected ascites into a low-risk (score ≥ 45) and high-risk group (score < 25) for secondary peritonitis. Overall, the discrimination of secondary peritonitis from SBP remains challenging. Our univariable analyses, random forest model, and LASSO point score may help clinicians with the crucial differentiation between SBP and secondary peritonitis.
KW - SBP
KW - ascites
KW - liver cirrhosis
KW - secondary peritonitis
KW - spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149770914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics13050994
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics13050994
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149770914
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 13
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 5
M1 - 994
ER -