TY - JOUR
T1 - Differentiation of Osteophytes and Disc Herniations in Spinal Radiculopathy Using Susceptibility-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
AU - Bender, Yvonne Yi Na
AU - Diederichs, Gerd
AU - Walter, Thula Cannon
AU - Wagner, Moritz
AU - Liebig, Thomas
AU - Rickert, Marcus
AU - Hermann, Kay Geert
AU - Hamm, Bernd
AU - Makowski, Marcus Richard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (SW-MRI) for the differentiation of osteophytes and disc herniations of the spine compared with that of conventional spine MR sequences and radiography. Materials and Methods This study was approved by the local ethics review board; written consent was obtained from all subjects. Eighty-one patients with suspected radiculopathy of the spine were included prospectively. Radiography, T1/T2, and SW-MRI of the cervical/lumbar spine were performed. As reference standard, 93 osteophytes (n = 48 patients) were identified on radiographs in combination with conventional T1/T2 images. One hundred fourteen posterior disc herniations (n = 60 patients) were identified on T1/T2 in combination with radiography excluding osteophytes. For this study, 2 observers independently assessed the presence of osteophytes and disc herniations on T1/T2 and SW-MRI, with radiographs excluded from the analysis. In a subgroup of patients (n = 19), additional computed tomography images were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver agreement were calculated. Results Most osteophytes (n = 92 of 93) and disc herniations (n = 113 of 114) could be identified and differentiated on SW-MRI magnitude/phase images, if radiographs were excluded from analysis. Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging achieved a sensitivity of 98.9% and specificity of 99.1% for the identification of osteophytes. Conventional T1/T2 spine MR sequences achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 68.6% and 86.5%, respectively, if radiographs were excluded from analysis. Regarding the size of osteophytes, SW-MRI showed a strong correlation with computed tomography (R2 = 0.96) and radiography (R2 = 0.95). In addition, SW-MRI achieved a higher interobserver agreement compared with conventional MR. Conclusions Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging enables the reliable differentiation of osteophytes and disc herniations in patients with spinal radiculopathy with a higher sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional T1/T2 MR sequences.
AB - Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (SW-MRI) for the differentiation of osteophytes and disc herniations of the spine compared with that of conventional spine MR sequences and radiography. Materials and Methods This study was approved by the local ethics review board; written consent was obtained from all subjects. Eighty-one patients with suspected radiculopathy of the spine were included prospectively. Radiography, T1/T2, and SW-MRI of the cervical/lumbar spine were performed. As reference standard, 93 osteophytes (n = 48 patients) were identified on radiographs in combination with conventional T1/T2 images. One hundred fourteen posterior disc herniations (n = 60 patients) were identified on T1/T2 in combination with radiography excluding osteophytes. For this study, 2 observers independently assessed the presence of osteophytes and disc herniations on T1/T2 and SW-MRI, with radiographs excluded from the analysis. In a subgroup of patients (n = 19), additional computed tomography images were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver agreement were calculated. Results Most osteophytes (n = 92 of 93) and disc herniations (n = 113 of 114) could be identified and differentiated on SW-MRI magnitude/phase images, if radiographs were excluded from analysis. Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging achieved a sensitivity of 98.9% and specificity of 99.1% for the identification of osteophytes. Conventional T1/T2 spine MR sequences achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 68.6% and 86.5%, respectively, if radiographs were excluded from analysis. Regarding the size of osteophytes, SW-MRI showed a strong correlation with computed tomography (R2 = 0.96) and radiography (R2 = 0.95). In addition, SW-MRI achieved a higher interobserver agreement compared with conventional MR. Conclusions Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging enables the reliable differentiation of osteophytes and disc herniations in patients with spinal radiculopathy with a higher sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional T1/T2 MR sequences.
KW - disc herniations
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - osteophytes
KW - spinal radiculopathy
KW - susceptibility-weighted MRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983491122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000314
DO - 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000314
M3 - Article
C2 - 27548342
AN - SCOPUS:84983491122
SN - 0020-9996
VL - 52
SP - 75
EP - 80
JO - Investigative Radiology
JF - Investigative Radiology
IS - 2
ER -