Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: global health considerations

Jorge Correale, Andrew J. Solomon, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Brenda L. Banwell, Fernando Gracia, Tirisham V. Gyang, Fernando Hamuy Diaz de Bedoya, Mary P. Harnegie, Bernhard Hemmer, Anu Jacob, Ho Jin Kim, Ruth Ann Marrie, Farrah J. Mateen, Scott D. Newsome, Lekha Pandit, Naraporn Prayoonwiwat, Mohammad A. Sahraian, Douglas K. Sato, Deanna Saylor, Fu Dong ShiAksel Siva, Kevin Tan, Shanthi Viswanathan, Mike P. Wattjes, Brian Weinshenker, Bassem Yamout, Kazuo Fujihara

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis can present specific challenges in patients from Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, eastern Europe, southeast Asia, and the Western Pacific. In these areas, environmental factors, genetic background, and access to medical care can differ substantially from those in North America and western Europe, where multiple sclerosis is most common. Furthermore, multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria have been developed primarily using data from North America and western Europe. Although some diagnoses mistaken for multiple sclerosis are common regardless of location, a comprehensive approach to the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, eastern Europe, southeast Asia, and the Western Pacific regions requires special consideration of diseases that are prevalent in those locations. A collaborative effort has therefore assessed global differences in multiple sclerosis differential diagnoses and proposed recommendations for evaluating patients with suspected multiple sclerosis in regions beyond North America and western Europe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1035-1049
Number of pages15
JournalThe Lancet Neurology
Volume23
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: global health considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this