TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis
T2 - an updated consensus approach
AU - Solomon, Andrew J.
AU - Arrambide, Georgina
AU - Brownlee, Wallace J.
AU - Flanagan, Eoin P.
AU - Amato, Maria Pia
AU - Amezcua, Lilyana
AU - Banwell, Brenda L.
AU - Barkhof, Frederik
AU - Corboy, John R.
AU - Correale, Jorge
AU - Fujihara, Kazuo
AU - Graves, Jennifer
AU - Harnegie, Mary Pat
AU - Hemmer, Bernhard
AU - Lechner-Scott, Jeannette
AU - Marrie, Ruth Ann
AU - Newsome, Scott D.
AU - Rocca, Maria A.
AU - Royal, Walter
AU - Waubant, Emmanuelle L.
AU - Yamout, Bassem
AU - Cohen, Jeffrey A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis requires careful attention to its differential diagnosis—many disorders can mimic the clinical manifestations and paraclinical findings of this disease. A collaborative effort, organised by The International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis in 2008, provided diagnostic approaches to multiple sclerosis and identified clinical and paraclinical findings (so-called red flags) suggestive of alternative diagnoses. Since then, knowledge of disorders in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has expanded substantially. For example, CNS inflammatory disorders that present with syndromes overlapping with multiple sclerosis can increasingly be distinguished from multiple sclerosis with the aid of specific clinical, MRI, and laboratory findings; studies of people misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis have also provided insights into clinical presentations for which extra caution is warranted. Considering these data, an update to the recommended diagnostic approaches to common clinical presentations and key clinical and paraclinical red flags is warranted to inform the contemporary clinical evaluation of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis.
AB - Accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis requires careful attention to its differential diagnosis—many disorders can mimic the clinical manifestations and paraclinical findings of this disease. A collaborative effort, organised by The International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis in 2008, provided diagnostic approaches to multiple sclerosis and identified clinical and paraclinical findings (so-called red flags) suggestive of alternative diagnoses. Since then, knowledge of disorders in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has expanded substantially. For example, CNS inflammatory disorders that present with syndromes overlapping with multiple sclerosis can increasingly be distinguished from multiple sclerosis with the aid of specific clinical, MRI, and laboratory findings; studies of people misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis have also provided insights into clinical presentations for which extra caution is warranted. Considering these data, an update to the recommended diagnostic approaches to common clinical presentations and key clinical and paraclinical red flags is warranted to inform the contemporary clinical evaluation of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165069988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00148-5
DO - 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00148-5
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85165069988
SN - 1474-4422
VL - 22
SP - 750
EP - 768
JO - The Lancet Neurology
JF - The Lancet Neurology
IS - 8
ER -