Die zweite meinung in der tumorchirurgie

Translated title of the contribution: Second opinion in oncological surgery. Benefits and problems in the view of the surgeon

H. Feussner, D. Wilhelm, M. Etter, J. R. Siewert

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In complicated oncological cases, a second opinion is desirable, also in the view of the care-providing surgeon. It serves interdisciplinary therapeutic planning, and helps improve the quality of treatment. In the case of highly consequential interventions, the patient has a legal right to a second opinion. On a practical level, however, the implementation of this possibility encounters problems: organizational shortcomings, incomplete patient documentation, the stresses of patient transportation, loss of valuable time, in particular in the case of postal consultation, following consultation in a center the carrying out of treatment there, whether at the urging of the doctors there or the patient himself, lack of remuneration for the efforts of the consultants. Today, however, all the necessary technical facilities are in place to enable various experts to be consulted, virtually simultaneously, on any case, via videoconferencing.

Translated title of the contributionSecond opinion in oncological surgery. Benefits and problems in the view of the surgeon
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)22-25
Number of pages4
JournalMMW-Fortschritte der Medizin
Volume142
Issue number4
StatePublished - 27 Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Second opinion in oncological surgery. Benefits and problems in the view of the surgeon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this