Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography

Dominik Laskowski, Sarah Feger, Maria Bosserdt, Elke Zimmermann, Mahmoud Mohamed, Benjamin Kendziora, Matthias Rief, Henryk Dreger, Melanie Estrella, Marc Dewey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection. Methods: This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients presenting with a clinical indication for ICA based on atypical angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the prospective single-center randomized controlled Coronary Artery Disease Management (CAD-Man) study. ECFs requiring immediate therapy and/or further workup including additional imaging were defined as clinically relevant. We evaluated the scope of ECFs in 329 patients and analyzed the potential clinical benefit of their detection. Results: ECFs were detected in 107 of 329 patients (32.5%; CTA: 101/167, 60.5%; ICA: 6/162, 3.7%; p <.001). Fifty-nine patients had clinically relevant ECFs (17.9%; CTA: 55/167, 32.9%; ICA: 4/162, 2.5%; p <.001). In the CTA group, ECFs potentially explained atypical chest pain in 13 of 101 patients with ECFs (12.9%). After initiation of therapy, chest pain improved in 4 (4.0%) and resolved in 7 patients (6.9%). Follow-up imaging was recommended in 33 (10.0%; CTA: 30/167, 18.0%; ICA: 3/162, 1.9%) and additional clinic consultation in 26 patients (7.9%; CTA: 25/167, 15.0%; ICA: 1/162, 0.6%). Malignancy was newly diagnosed in one patient (0.3%; CTA: 1/167, 0.6%; ICA: 0). Conclusions: In this randomized study, CTA but not ICA detected clinically relevant ECFs that may point to possible other causes of chest pain in patients without CAD. Thus, CTA might preclude the need for ICA in those patients. Trial registration: NCT Unique ID: 00844220 Key Points: • CTA detects ten times more clinically relevant ECFs than ICA. • Actionable clinically relevant ECFs affect patient management and therapy and may thus improve chest pain. • Detection of ECFs explaining chest pain on CTA might preclude the need for performing ICA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-131
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chest pain
  • Computed tomography angiography
  • Coronary angiography
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Incidental findings

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this