TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep-learning-based image quality enhancement of CT-like MR imaging in patients with suspected traumatic shoulder injury
AU - Feuerriegel, Georg C.
AU - Weiss, Kilian
AU - Tu Van, Anh
AU - Leonhardt, Yannik
AU - Neumann, Jan
AU - Gassert, Florian T.
AU - Haas, Yannick
AU - Schwarz, Markus
AU - Makowski, Marcus R.
AU - Woertler, Klaus
AU - Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
AU - Gersing, Alexandra S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT-like MR images reconstructed with an algorithm combining compressed sense (CS) with deep learning (DL) in patients with suspected osseous shoulder injury compared to conventional CS-reconstructed images. Methods: Thirty-two patients (12 women, mean age 46 ± 14.9 years) with suspected traumatic shoulder injury were prospectively enrolled into the study. All patients received MR imaging of the shoulder, including a CT-like 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo (T1 GRE) sequence and in case of suspected fracture a conventional CT. An automated DL-based algorithm, combining CS and DL (CS DL) was used to reconstruct images of the same k-space data as used for CS reconstructions. Two musculoskeletal radiologists assessed the images for osseous pathologies, image quality and visibility of anatomical landmarks using a 5-point Likert scale. Moreover, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Results: Compared to CT, all acute fractures (n = 23) and osseous pathologies were detected accurately on the CS only and CS DL images with almost perfect agreement between the CS DL and CS only images (κ 0.95 (95 %confidence interval 0.82–1.00). Image quality as well as the visibility of the fracture lines, bone fragments and glenoid borders were overall rated significantly higher for the CS DL reconstructions than the CS only images (CS DL range 3.7–4.9 and CS only range 3.2–3.8, P = 0.01–0.04). Significantly higher SNR and CNR values were observed for the CS DL reconstructions (P = 0.02–0.03). Conclusion: Evaluation of traumatic shoulder pathologies is feasible using a DL-based algorithm for reconstruction of high-resolution CT-like MR imaging.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT-like MR images reconstructed with an algorithm combining compressed sense (CS) with deep learning (DL) in patients with suspected osseous shoulder injury compared to conventional CS-reconstructed images. Methods: Thirty-two patients (12 women, mean age 46 ± 14.9 years) with suspected traumatic shoulder injury were prospectively enrolled into the study. All patients received MR imaging of the shoulder, including a CT-like 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo (T1 GRE) sequence and in case of suspected fracture a conventional CT. An automated DL-based algorithm, combining CS and DL (CS DL) was used to reconstruct images of the same k-space data as used for CS reconstructions. Two musculoskeletal radiologists assessed the images for osseous pathologies, image quality and visibility of anatomical landmarks using a 5-point Likert scale. Moreover, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Results: Compared to CT, all acute fractures (n = 23) and osseous pathologies were detected accurately on the CS only and CS DL images with almost perfect agreement between the CS DL and CS only images (κ 0.95 (95 %confidence interval 0.82–1.00). Image quality as well as the visibility of the fracture lines, bone fragments and glenoid borders were overall rated significantly higher for the CS DL reconstructions than the CS only images (CS DL range 3.7–4.9 and CS only range 3.2–3.8, P = 0.01–0.04). Significantly higher SNR and CNR values were observed for the CS DL reconstructions (P = 0.02–0.03). Conclusion: Evaluation of traumatic shoulder pathologies is feasible using a DL-based algorithm for reconstruction of high-resolution CT-like MR imaging.
KW - Bankart Lesion
KW - Deep Learning
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
KW - Shoulder Injuries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179077165&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111246
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111246
M3 - Article
C2 - 38056345
AN - SCOPUS:85179077165
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 170
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
M1 - 111246
ER -