Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Deep Anomaly Detection on Tennessee Eastman Process Data

  • Fabian Hartung
  • , Billy Joe Franks
  • , Tobias Michels
  • , Dennis Wagner
  • , Philipp Liznerski
  • , Steffen Reithermann
  • , Sophie Fellenz
  • , Fabian Jirasek
  • , Maja Rudolph
  • , Daniel Neider
  • , Heike Leitte
  • , Chen Song
  • , Benjamin Kloepper
  • , Stephan Mandt
  • , Michael Bortz
  • , Jakob Burger
  • , Hans Hasse
  • , Marius Kloft
  • University of Kaiserslautern
  • BASF SE
  • Bosch AI
  • pro3dure medical GmbH
  • ABB
  • University of California, Irvine
  • CCHPC-Fraunhofer ITWM

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper provides the first comprehensive evaluation and analysis of modern (deep-learning-based) unsupervised anomaly detection methods for chemical process data. We focus on the Tennessee Eastman process dataset, a standard litmus test to benchmark anomaly detection methods for nearly three decades. Our extensive study will facilitate choosing appropriate anomaly detection methods in industrial applications. From the benchmark, we conclude that reconstruction-based methods are the methods of choice, followed by generative and forecasting-based methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1077-1082
Number of pages6
JournalChemie-Ingenieur-Technik
Volume95
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Anomaly detection
  • Benchmark
  • Chemical process data
  • Tennessee Eastman process
  • Time series

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deep Anomaly Detection on Tennessee Eastman Process Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this