Deconfounding Legal Judgment Prediction for European Court of Human Rights Cases Towards Better Alignment with Experts

T. Y.S.S. Santosh, Shanshan Xu, Oana Ichim, Matthias Grabmair

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

This work demonstrates that Legal Judgement Prediction systems without expert-informed adjustments can be vulnerable to shallow, distracting surface signals that arise from corpus construction, case distribution, and confounding factors. To mitigate this, we use domain expertise to strategically identify statistically predictive but legally irrelevant information. We adopt adversarial training to prevent the system from relying on it. We evaluate our deconfounded models by employing interpretability techniques and comparing to expert annotations. Quantitative experiments and qualitative analysis show that our deconfounded model consistently aligns better with expert rationales than baselines trained for prediction only. We further contribute a set of reference expert annotations to the validation and testing partitions of an existing benchmark dataset of European Court of Human Rights cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages1120-1138
Number of pages19
StatePublished - 2022
Event2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022 - Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Duration: 7 Dec 202211 Dec 2022

Conference

Conference2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022
Country/TerritoryUnited Arab Emirates
CityAbu Dhabi
Period7/12/2211/12/22

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deconfounding Legal Judgment Prediction for European Court of Human Rights Cases Towards Better Alignment with Experts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this