Dataset of evidence based instruction forms for human error reduction in complex systems

Claudius Hammann; Christoph Krause; Anna Feldhütter

doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105838

Dataset of evidence based instruction forms for human error reduction in complex systems

Claudius Hammann, Christoph Krause, Anna Feldhütter

Chair of Buildings Physics

Technical University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The article describes the export data of a flight research simulator experiment. The data show how different forms of presentation affect the behavior of instructions for test subjects. The representation forms algorithm, image and text are examined with regard to the number of top events, error frequencies, execution times and subjectively perceived workload. For this purpose, a study was carried out with n = 93 test persons in the research flight simulator, in which the test persons had the task of landing a passenger aircraft using the autopilot with different representation forms. 14 Possible work errors with 11 different representation forms. Further, there are questionnaire answers from test persons.

Original language	English
Article number	105838
Journal	Data in Brief
Volume	31
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105838
State	Published - Aug 2020

Keywords

Evidence based
Flight simulator
Risk quantification
Safety
Standard operating procedures
Work error

Access to Document

10.1016/j.dib.2020.105838

Cite this

@article{64b110ca5eed41dead98f6a86ebbf7cb,

title = "Dataset of evidence based instruction forms for human error reduction in complex systems",

abstract = "The article describes the export data of a flight research simulator experiment. The data show how different forms of presentation affect the behavior of instructions for test subjects. The representation forms algorithm, image and text are examined with regard to the number of top events, error frequencies, execution times and subjectively perceived workload. For this purpose, a study was carried out with n = 93 test persons in the research flight simulator, in which the test persons had the task of landing a passenger aircraft using the autopilot with different representation forms. 14 Possible work errors with 11 different representation forms. Further, there are questionnaire answers from test persons.",

keywords = "Evidence based, Flight simulator, Risk quantification, Safety, Standard operating procedures, Work error",

author = "Claudius Hammann and Christoph Krause and Anna Feldh{\"u}tter",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/j.dib.2020.105838",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

journal = "Data in Brief",

issn = "2352-3409",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dataset of evidence based instruction forms for human error reduction in complex systems

AU - Hammann, Claudius

AU - Krause, Christoph

AU - Feldhütter, Anna

PY - 2020/8

Y1 - 2020/8

N2 - The article describes the export data of a flight research simulator experiment. The data show how different forms of presentation affect the behavior of instructions for test subjects. The representation forms algorithm, image and text are examined with regard to the number of top events, error frequencies, execution times and subjectively perceived workload. For this purpose, a study was carried out with n = 93 test persons in the research flight simulator, in which the test persons had the task of landing a passenger aircraft using the autopilot with different representation forms. 14 Possible work errors with 11 different representation forms. Further, there are questionnaire answers from test persons.

AB - The article describes the export data of a flight research simulator experiment. The data show how different forms of presentation affect the behavior of instructions for test subjects. The representation forms algorithm, image and text are examined with regard to the number of top events, error frequencies, execution times and subjectively perceived workload. For this purpose, a study was carried out with n = 93 test persons in the research flight simulator, in which the test persons had the task of landing a passenger aircraft using the autopilot with different representation forms. 14 Possible work errors with 11 different representation forms. Further, there are questionnaire answers from test persons.

KW - Evidence based

KW - Flight simulator

KW - Risk quantification

KW - Safety

KW - Standard operating procedures

KW - Work error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086567860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105838

DO - 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105838

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85086567860

SN - 2352-3409

VL - 31

JO - Data in Brief

JF - Data in Brief

M1 - 105838

ER -

Dataset of evidence based instruction forms for human error reduction in complex systems

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this