TY - JOUR
T1 - CutFEM forward modeling for EEG source analysis
AU - Erdbrügger, Tim
AU - Westhoff, Andreas
AU - Höltershinken, Malte
AU - Radecke, Jan Ole
AU - Buschermöhle, Yvonne
AU - Buyx, Alena
AU - Wallois, Fabrice
AU - Pursiainen, Sampsa
AU - Gross, Joachim
AU - Lencer, Rebekka
AU - Engwer, Christian
AU - Wolters, Carsten
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Erdbrügger, Westhoff, Höltershinken, Radecke, Buschermöhle, Buyx, Wallois, Pursiainen, Gross, Lencer, Engwer and Wolters.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Source analysis of Electroencephalography (EEG) data requires the computation of the scalp potential induced by current sources in the brain. This so-called EEG forward problem is based on an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head, represented by a partial differential equation which can be solved using the finite element method (FEM). FEM offers flexibility when modeling anisotropic tissue conductivities but requires a volumetric discretization, a mesh, of the head domain. Structured hexahedral meshes are easy to create in an automatic fashion, while tetrahedral meshes are better suited to model curved geometries. Tetrahedral meshes, thus, offer better accuracy but are more difficult to create. Methods: We introduce CutFEM for EEG forward simulations to integrate the strengths of hexahedra and tetrahedra. It belongs to the family of unfitted finite element methods, decoupling mesh and geometry representation. Following a description of the method, we will employ CutFEM in both controlled spherical scenarios and the reconstruction of somatosensory-evoked potentials. Results: CutFEM outperforms competing FEM approaches with regard to numerical accuracy, memory consumption, and computational speed while being able to mesh arbitrarily touching compartments. Discussion: CutFEM balances numerical accuracy, computational efficiency, and a smooth approximation of complex geometries that has previously not been available in FEM-based EEG forward modeling.
AB - Introduction: Source analysis of Electroencephalography (EEG) data requires the computation of the scalp potential induced by current sources in the brain. This so-called EEG forward problem is based on an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head, represented by a partial differential equation which can be solved using the finite element method (FEM). FEM offers flexibility when modeling anisotropic tissue conductivities but requires a volumetric discretization, a mesh, of the head domain. Structured hexahedral meshes are easy to create in an automatic fashion, while tetrahedral meshes are better suited to model curved geometries. Tetrahedral meshes, thus, offer better accuracy but are more difficult to create. Methods: We introduce CutFEM for EEG forward simulations to integrate the strengths of hexahedra and tetrahedra. It belongs to the family of unfitted finite element methods, decoupling mesh and geometry representation. Following a description of the method, we will employ CutFEM in both controlled spherical scenarios and the reconstruction of somatosensory-evoked potentials. Results: CutFEM outperforms competing FEM approaches with regard to numerical accuracy, memory consumption, and computational speed while being able to mesh arbitrarily touching compartments. Discussion: CutFEM balances numerical accuracy, computational efficiency, and a smooth approximation of complex geometries that has previously not been available in FEM-based EEG forward modeling.
KW - EEG forward problem
KW - finite element method
KW - level set
KW - realistic head modeling
KW - unfitted FEM
KW - volume conductor modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170369962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1216758
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1216758
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85170369962
SN - 1662-5161
VL - 17
JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
M1 - 1216758
ER -