TY - GEN
T1 - CSM
T2 - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2021
AU - Kirschner, Robin Jeanne
AU - Jantalia, João
AU - Mansfeld, Nico
AU - Abdolshah, Saeed
AU - Haddadin, Sami
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 IEEE
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In physical human-robot interaction (pHRI), robots need to detect and react to intended and unintended contacts in a safe manner. Proprioceptive sensing capabilities and collision detection and identification techniques differ among commercially available robots, which means that also their sensitivity to detect dynamic collisions with the environment or the human co-worker differ. Up to now, there exists no standardized procedure for assessing the contact sensitivity of a robotic system. In this paper, we propose the concept of contact sensitivity maps (CSM), a relationship between the robot's dynamic impact properties and the reliability of its collision handling. The CSM allows the robot user to determine for which robot workspace areas and dynamic collision parameters (mass, velocity) reliable contact detection and reaction can be expected. We propose a standardized benchmarking procedure and test setup for deriving CSMs. Finally, we analyze and compare the experimental results of the Universal Robots UR10e, UR5e, and Franka Emika Panda, where we observe significant differences in contact sensitivity.
AB - In physical human-robot interaction (pHRI), robots need to detect and react to intended and unintended contacts in a safe manner. Proprioceptive sensing capabilities and collision detection and identification techniques differ among commercially available robots, which means that also their sensitivity to detect dynamic collisions with the environment or the human co-worker differ. Up to now, there exists no standardized procedure for assessing the contact sensitivity of a robotic system. In this paper, we propose the concept of contact sensitivity maps (CSM), a relationship between the robot's dynamic impact properties and the reliability of its collision handling. The CSM allows the robot user to determine for which robot workspace areas and dynamic collision parameters (mass, velocity) reliable contact detection and reaction can be expected. We propose a standardized benchmarking procedure and test setup for deriving CSMs. Finally, we analyze and compare the experimental results of the Universal Robots UR10e, UR5e, and Franka Emika Panda, where we observe significant differences in contact sensitivity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124356396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561528
DO - 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561528
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85124356396
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
SP - 3590
EP - 3596
BT - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2021
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 30 May 2021 through 5 June 2021
ER -