Corrigendum to “Experiments on fire-protected and hot-dip galvanised steel bolted connections” [Fire Safety J. 146 (2024) 104130] (Fire Safety Journal (2024) 146, (S0379711224000420), (10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104130))

The authors regret that we have identified small errors which does not affect the content and findings of the paper. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Corrigendum Fig. 1: The top 3D sketch with the connections 1 to 4 from the first test setup was inserted twice. The bottom sketch from Fig. 1 was replaced with the 3D sketch with the connections 5 to 8 from the second test setup and the colour legend.[Figure presented] Corrigendum Fig. 23 (d): After re-evaluating the measurement data, it was determined that there was a mix-up of the measuring points at connection detail no. 8 in the area of the hot-dip galvanised lug. Specifically, measuring point 57 on the galvanised secondary beam and measuring point 58 on the coated stiffener were switched during the measurement. It was originally assumed that measuring point 58 had delivered incorrect temperature values. For this reason, the temperature at measuring point 83 - at the identical position, but in the coated stiffener - was specified in the article as a substitute in the original evaluation. In the course of the correction, the temperature curve along the running coordinate x after 30 minutes of the fire test for connection detail no. 8 in Fig. 23 diagram (d) was adjusted by replacing the previously used measuring point 83 with the corrected measuring point 58 on the hot-dip galvanised lug. The temperature developments from the finite element model and the analytical calculation were also indicated at this position and adjusted accordingly in the diagram; no changes were made to diagrams (a) to (c).[Figure presented] Corrigendum Fig. 25: In the course of a re-evaluation of the measurement data, it was determined that two measuring points in the area of the hot-dip galvanised lug at connection detail no. 8 - measuring point 57 on the galvanised secondary beam and measuring point 58 on the coated stiffener - had been switched during the measurement. It was originally assumed that measuring point 58 had delivered incorrect temperature values. For this reason, the temperature at measuring point 83 - at the identical position, but in the coated stiffener - was stated in the article as a substitute in the original evaluation. In the course of the correction, the temperature curve along the running coordinate after 30 minutes of the fire test for connection detail no. 8 in the diagram in Fig. 25 was adjusted by replacing the previously used measuring point 83 with the corrected measuring point 58 on the hot-dip galvanised lug.[Figure