Abstract
The authors regret that the letter inaccurately refers to “the lancet diabetes endocrinology” and “The Lancet” while it should read: “The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology”. The correct title of the letter should read: “Critique of the “Comment” entitled: “Pyrethroid exposure: Not so harmless after all” by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology”. The authors wish to clarify that the comment was published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology and not The Lancet. The authors also wish to clarify that The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology chose not to publish their criticism of the article because the correspondence content published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology is only accepted within 8 weeks of publication of the original item.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 57 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Toxicology Letters |
| Volume | 346 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Aug 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Critique of the “Comment” etitled “Pyrethroid exposure: not so harmless after all” (Toxicology Letters (2021) 340 (1–3), (S0378427420305270), (10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.12.020))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver