Correction to: Supersingular K3 surfaces are unirational (Inventiones mathematicae, (2015), 200, 3, (979-1014), 10.1007/s00222-014-0547-7)

Christian Liedtke

doi:10.1007/s00222-020-01028-8

Correction to: Supersingular K3 surfaces are unirational (Inventiones mathematicae, (2015), 200, 3, (979-1014), 10.1007/s00222-014-0547-7)

Christian Liedtke

Chair of Algebraic Geometry

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

As was pointed out by Bragg and Lieblich in [1], the proof of [2, Proposition 3.5] contains a mistake, which has the effect that the main result, the unirationality of supersingular K3 surfaces [2, Theorem 5.3], remains a conjecture.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1407-1409
Number of pages	3
Journal	Inventiones Mathematicae
Volume	223
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-020-01028-8
State	Published - Mar 2021

Access to Document

10.1007/s00222-020-01028-8

Cite this

@article{87decd692b294ff6ba34aa0888bfa1a7,

title = "Correction to: Supersingular K3 surfaces are unirational (Inventiones mathematicae, (2015), 200, 3, (979-1014), 10.1007/s00222-014-0547-7)",

abstract = "As was pointed out by Bragg and Lieblich in [1], the proof of [2, Proposition 3.5] contains a mistake, which has the effect that the main result, the unirationality of supersingular K3 surfaces [2, Theorem 5.3], remains a conjecture.",

author = "Christian Liedtke",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2021",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s00222-020-01028-8",

language = "English",

volume = "223",

pages = "1407--1409",

journal = "Inventiones Mathematicae",

issn = "0020-9910",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Supersingular K3 surfaces are unirational (Inventiones mathematicae, (2015), 200, 3, (979-1014), 10.1007/s00222-014-0547-7)

AU - Liedtke, Christian

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

N2 - As was pointed out by Bragg and Lieblich in [1], the proof of [2, Proposition 3.5] contains a mistake, which has the effect that the main result, the unirationality of supersingular K3 surfaces [2, Theorem 5.3], remains a conjecture.

AB - As was pointed out by Bragg and Lieblich in [1], the proof of [2, Proposition 3.5] contains a mistake, which has the effect that the main result, the unirationality of supersingular K3 surfaces [2, Theorem 5.3], remains a conjecture.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85100239307

U2 - 10.1007/s00222-020-01028-8

DO - 10.1007/s00222-020-01028-8

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85100239307

SN - 0020-9910

VL - 223

SP - 1407

EP - 1409

JO - Inventiones Mathematicae

JF - Inventiones Mathematicae

IS - 3

ER -

Correction to: Supersingular K3 surfaces are unirational (Inventiones mathematicae, (2015), 200, 3, (979-1014), 10.1007/s00222-014-0547-7)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this