Coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction

F. J. Neumann, H. Walter, G. Richardt, C. Schmitt, A. Schömig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective - To investigate the feasibility of coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction. Design - Prospective observational study. Patients - 80 patients undergoing direct balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction who had coronary Palmaz-Schatz stents implanted during a 3 year study period. Indications for stenting were abrupt reocclusion, large dissection with threatened reocclusion, and failure to achieve brisk flow of contrast by angioplasty alone. Interventions - After stenting, 50 patients were treated by conventional anticoagulation and 30 patients received antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine. Main outcome measures - Death and subacute reocclusion within two weeks. Results - Coronary stenting fully restored vessel patency in 79 patients (98.8%). 10 of 14 patients with symptoms of Killip class IV on admission were discharged from hospital alive. Three of the 66 patients with symptoms of Killip classes I-III died in hospital. Repeat angiography in 59 of these patients, showed 3 symptomatic and 2 silent reocclusions (reocclusion rate 8.5%). No stent thromboses were detected in patients treated with ticlopidine. Conclusions - Coronary stenting is a safe and effective treatment for complicated direct balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. In patients with symptoms of Killip classes I to III the risk of subacute reocclusion is comparable to that of bail-out stenting after elective balloon angioplasty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-126
Number of pages6
JournalHeart
Volume75
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Keywords

  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Balloon angioplasty
  • Coronary stents
  • Thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this