Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Contrasting carbon allocation responses of juvenile European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) to competition and ozone

  • Technical University of Munich
  • University of Sheffield
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München German Research Center for Environmental Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Allocation of recent photoassimilates of juvenile beech and spruce in response to twice-ambient ozone (2 × O3) and plant competition (i.e. intra vs. inter-specific) was examined in a phytotron study. To this end, we employed continuous 13CO2/12CO2 labeling during late summer and pursued tracer kinetics in CO2 released from stems. In beech, allocation of recent photoassimilates to stems was significantly lowered under 2 × O3 and increased in spruce when grown in mixed culture. As total tree biomass was not yet affected by the treatments, C allocation reflected incipient tree responses providing the mechanistic basis for biomass partitioning as observed in longer experiments. Compartmental modeling characterized functional properties of substrate pools supplying respiratory C demand. Respiration of spruce appeared to be exclusively supplied by recent photoassimilates. In beech, older C, putatively located in stem parenchyma cells, was a major source of respiratory substrate, reflecting the fundamental anatomical disparity between angiosperm beech and gymnosperm spruce.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)534-543
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume196
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2015

Keywords

  • CO efflux
  • Compartmental modeling
  • Plant-plant competition (intra versus inter-specific)
  • Stable carbon isotope (CO/CO) labeling
  • Tropospheric ozone (O)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contrasting carbon allocation responses of juvenile European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) to competition and ozone'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this