TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus Statements among European Sleep Surgery Experts on Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
T2 - Part 1 Definitions and Diagnosis
AU - Olszewska, Ewa
AU - De Vito, Andrea
AU - Baptista, Peter
AU - Heiser, Clemens
AU - O’Connor-Reina, Carlos
AU - Kotecha, Bhik
AU - Vanderveken, Olivier
AU - Vicini, Claudio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Seeking consensus on definitions and diagnosis of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among sleep surgeons is important, particularly in this relatively new field with variability in knowledge and practices. A set of statements was developed based on the literature and circulated among eight panel members of European experts, utilizing the Delphi method. Responses in agreement and disagreement on each statement and the comments were used to assess the level of consensus and develop a revised version. The new version with the level of consensus and anonymized comments was sent to each panel member as the second round. This was repeated a total of five rounds. The total number of statements included in the initial set was 112. In the first round, of all eight panelists, the percentage of questions that had consensus among the eight, seven, and six panelists were 45%, 4.5%, and 7.1%, respectively. In the final set of statements consisting of 99, the percentage of questions that had consensus among the 8, 7, and 6 panelists went up to 66.7%, 24.2%, and 6.1%, respectively. Delphi’s method demonstrated an efficient method of interaction among experts and the establishment of consensus on a specific set of statements.
AB - Seeking consensus on definitions and diagnosis of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among sleep surgeons is important, particularly in this relatively new field with variability in knowledge and practices. A set of statements was developed based on the literature and circulated among eight panel members of European experts, utilizing the Delphi method. Responses in agreement and disagreement on each statement and the comments were used to assess the level of consensus and develop a revised version. The new version with the level of consensus and anonymized comments was sent to each panel member as the second round. This was repeated a total of five rounds. The total number of statements included in the initial set was 112. In the first round, of all eight panelists, the percentage of questions that had consensus among the eight, seven, and six panelists were 45%, 4.5%, and 7.1%, respectively. In the final set of statements consisting of 99, the percentage of questions that had consensus among the 8, 7, and 6 panelists went up to 66.7%, 24.2%, and 6.1%, respectively. Delphi’s method demonstrated an efficient method of interaction among experts and the establishment of consensus on a specific set of statements.
KW - Delphi method
KW - consensus
KW - definitions
KW - diagnosis
KW - obstructive sleep apnea
KW - sleep apnea
KW - snoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183396284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm13020502
DO - 10.3390/jcm13020502
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183396284
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 13
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 2
M1 - 502
ER -