TY - JOUR
T1 - Computer-assisted simulated workplace-based assessment in surgery
T2 - Application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance within a mixed-reality simulation
AU - Stefan, Philipp
AU - Pfandler, Michael
AU - Kullmann, Aljoscha
AU - Eck, Ulrich
AU - Koch, Amelie
AU - Mehren, Christoph
AU - Von Der Heide, Anna
AU - Weidert, Simon
AU - Fürmetz, Julian
AU - Euler, Ekkehard
AU - Lazarovici, Marc
AU - Navab, Nassir
AU - Weigl, Matthias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023/1/19
Y1 - 2023/1/19
N2 - Objectives Workplace-based assessment (WBA) is a key requirement of competency-based medical education in postgraduate surgical education. Although simulated workplace-based assessment (SWBA) has been proposed to complement WBA, it is insufficiently adopted in surgical education. In particular, approaches to criterion-referenced and automated assessment of intraoperative surgical competency in contextualized SWBA settings are missing. Main objectives were (1) application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance and exemplary adaptation to spine surgery (vertebroplasty); (2) development of computer-assisted assessment based on criterion-referenced metrics; and (3) implementation in contextualized, team-based operating room (OR) simulation, and evaluation of validity. Design Multistage development and assessment study: (1) expert-based definition of performance indicators based on framework's performance domains; (2) development of respective assessment metrics based on preoperative planning and intraoperative performance data; (3) implementation in mixed-reality OR simulation and assessment of surgeons operating in a confederate team. Statistical analyses included internal consistency and interdomain associations, correlations with experience, and technical and non-technical performances. Setting Surgical simulation center. Full surgical team set-up within mixed-reality OR simulation. Participants Eleven surgeons were recruited from two teaching hospitals. Eligibility criteria included surgical specialists in orthopedic, trauma, or neurosurgery with prior VP or kyphoplasty experience. Main outcome measures Computer-assisted assessment of surgeons' intraoperative performance. Results Performance scores were associated with surgeons' experience, observational assessment (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill) scores and overall pass/fail ratings. Results provide strong evidence for validity of our computer-assisted SWBA approach. Diverse indicators of surgeons' technical and non-technical performances could be quantified and captured. Conclusions This study is the first to investigate computer-assisted assessment based on a competency framework in authentic, contextualized team-based OR simulation. Our approach discriminates surgical competency across the domains of intraoperative performance. It advances previous automated assessment based on the use of current surgical simulators in decontextualized settings. Our findings inform future use of computer-assisted multidomain competency assessments of surgeons using SWBA approaches.
AB - Objectives Workplace-based assessment (WBA) is a key requirement of competency-based medical education in postgraduate surgical education. Although simulated workplace-based assessment (SWBA) has been proposed to complement WBA, it is insufficiently adopted in surgical education. In particular, approaches to criterion-referenced and automated assessment of intraoperative surgical competency in contextualized SWBA settings are missing. Main objectives were (1) application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance and exemplary adaptation to spine surgery (vertebroplasty); (2) development of computer-assisted assessment based on criterion-referenced metrics; and (3) implementation in contextualized, team-based operating room (OR) simulation, and evaluation of validity. Design Multistage development and assessment study: (1) expert-based definition of performance indicators based on framework's performance domains; (2) development of respective assessment metrics based on preoperative planning and intraoperative performance data; (3) implementation in mixed-reality OR simulation and assessment of surgeons operating in a confederate team. Statistical analyses included internal consistency and interdomain associations, correlations with experience, and technical and non-technical performances. Setting Surgical simulation center. Full surgical team set-up within mixed-reality OR simulation. Participants Eleven surgeons were recruited from two teaching hospitals. Eligibility criteria included surgical specialists in orthopedic, trauma, or neurosurgery with prior VP or kyphoplasty experience. Main outcome measures Computer-assisted assessment of surgeons' intraoperative performance. Results Performance scores were associated with surgeons' experience, observational assessment (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill) scores and overall pass/fail ratings. Results provide strong evidence for validity of our computer-assisted SWBA approach. Diverse indicators of surgeons' technical and non-technical performances could be quantified and captured. Conclusions This study is the first to investigate computer-assisted assessment based on a competency framework in authentic, contextualized team-based OR simulation. Our approach discriminates surgical competency across the domains of intraoperative performance. It advances previous automated assessment based on the use of current surgical simulators in decontextualized settings. Our findings inform future use of computer-assisted multidomain competency assessments of surgeons using SWBA approaches.
KW - minimally invasive surgical procedures
KW - outcomes research
KW - technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146964581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000135
DO - 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000135
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146964581
SN - 2631-4940
VL - 5
JO - BMJ Surgery, Interventions, and Health Technologies
JF - BMJ Surgery, Interventions, and Health Technologies
IS - 1
M1 - 000135
ER -