TY - JOUR
T1 - Computational identification of protein complexes from network interactions
T2 - Present state, challenges, and the way forward
AU - Omranian, Sara
AU - Nikoloski, Zoran
AU - Grimm, Dominik G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Physically interacting proteins form macromolecule complexes that drive diverse cellular processes. Advances in experimental techniques that capture interactions between proteins provide us with protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks from several model organisms. These datasets have enabled the prediction and other computational analyses of protein complexes. Here we provide a systematic review of the state-of-the-art algorithms for protein complex prediction from PPI networks proposed in the past two decades. The existing approaches that solve this problem are categorized into three groups, including: cluster-quality-based, node affinity-based, and network embedding-based approaches, and we compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages. We further include a comparative analysis by computing the performance of eighteen methods based on twelve well-established performance measures on four widely used benchmark protein–protein interaction networks. Finally, the limitations and drawbacks of both, current data and approaches, along with the potential solutions in this field are discussed, with emphasis on the points that pave the way for future research efforts in this field.
AB - Physically interacting proteins form macromolecule complexes that drive diverse cellular processes. Advances in experimental techniques that capture interactions between proteins provide us with protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks from several model organisms. These datasets have enabled the prediction and other computational analyses of protein complexes. Here we provide a systematic review of the state-of-the-art algorithms for protein complex prediction from PPI networks proposed in the past two decades. The existing approaches that solve this problem are categorized into three groups, including: cluster-quality-based, node affinity-based, and network embedding-based approaches, and we compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages. We further include a comparative analysis by computing the performance of eighteen methods based on twelve well-established performance measures on four widely used benchmark protein–protein interaction networks. Finally, the limitations and drawbacks of both, current data and approaches, along with the potential solutions in this field are discussed, with emphasis on the points that pave the way for future research efforts in this field.
KW - Network Clustering Algorithms
KW - Network embedding
KW - Protein Complex Prediction
KW - Protein-Protein interaction network
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132404495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.049
DO - 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.049
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85132404495
SN - 2001-0370
VL - 20
SP - 2699
EP - 2712
JO - Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
JF - Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
ER -