TY - GEN
T1 - Complex-Valued Neural Networks for Millimeter Wave FMCW-Radar Angle Estimations
AU - Kaiser, Kevin
AU - Daugalas, Jonas
AU - Lopez-Randulfe, Javier
AU - Knoll, Alois
AU - Weigel, Robert
AU - Lurz, Fabian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 European Microwave Association (EuMA).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Processing radar signals with neural networks has shown promising results in classification and regression tasks. While processed radar data is intrinsically complex-valued, most architectures using neural networks are comprised of real-values and their arithmetic. Previous work has found that keeping the complex-valued number system and extending it into the domain of neural networks can be beneficial. In this paper, we demonstrate that in two-dimensional direction-of-arrival (DoA) estimation, complex-valued neural networks (CVNNs) show better results than real-valued neural networks (RVNNs). Real-world recordings of ten different FMCW radar devices were used to train numerous models, varying in the computational complexity and varying in data properties. Over all models trained, the best CVNN surpassed the best RVNN by 14%. In terms of model complexity, CVNNs also showed better results, both per trainable parameter and per floating point operation (FLOP). Similarly, CVNNs surpass RVNNs, both when trained with decreased data quantity and decreased data quality.
AB - Processing radar signals with neural networks has shown promising results in classification and regression tasks. While processed radar data is intrinsically complex-valued, most architectures using neural networks are comprised of real-values and their arithmetic. Previous work has found that keeping the complex-valued number system and extending it into the domain of neural networks can be beneficial. In this paper, we demonstrate that in two-dimensional direction-of-arrival (DoA) estimation, complex-valued neural networks (CVNNs) show better results than real-valued neural networks (RVNNs). Real-world recordings of ten different FMCW radar devices were used to train numerous models, varying in the computational complexity and varying in data properties. Over all models trained, the best CVNN surpassed the best RVNN by 14%. In terms of model complexity, CVNNs also showed better results, both per trainable parameter and per floating point operation (FLOP). Similarly, CVNNs surpass RVNNs, both when trained with decreased data quantity and decreased data quality.
KW - computational complexity
KW - machine learning
KW - millimeter wave radar
KW - neural networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141935378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.23919/EuRAD54643.2022.9924767
DO - 10.23919/EuRAD54643.2022.9924767
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85141935378
T3 - 2022 19th European Radar Conference, EuRAD 2022
SP - 145
EP - 148
BT - 2022 19th European Radar Conference, EuRAD 2022
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 19th European Radar Conference, EuRAD 2022
Y2 - 28 September 2022 through 30 September 2022
ER -