TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism markers for the genetic analysis of a galloway cattle population
AU - Herráez, David López
AU - Schäfer, Holger
AU - Mosner, Jörn
AU - Fries, Hans Rudolf
AU - Wink, Michael
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Highly informative genetic markers are essential for efficient management of cattle populations, as well as for food safety. After a decade of domination by microsatellite markers, a new type of genetic marker, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), has recently appeared on the scene. In the present study, the exclusion power of both kinds of markers with regards to individual identification and parental analysis was directly compared in a Galloway cattle population. Seventeen bovine microsatellites were distributed in three incremental marker sets (10, 14 and 17 microsatellite markers) and used for cattle genotyping. A set of 43 bovine SNP was used for genotyping the same cattle population. The accuracy of both kinds of markers in individual identification was evaluated using probability of identity estimations. These were 2.4 × 10-8 for the 10 microsatellite set, 2.3 × 10-11 for the 14 microsatellite set, and 1.4 × 10-13 for the 17 microsatellite marker set. For the 43 SNP markers, the estimated probability of identity was 5.3 × 10-11. The exclusion power of both kinds of markers in parental analysis was evaluated using paternity exclusion estimations, and, in addition to this, by estimation of the parental exclusion probability in 18 Galloway family trios. Paternity exclusion was estimated to be over 99% for microsatellites, and approx. 98% for SNP. Both, microsatellite and SNP sets of markers showed similar parental exclusion probabilities.
AB - Highly informative genetic markers are essential for efficient management of cattle populations, as well as for food safety. After a decade of domination by microsatellite markers, a new type of genetic marker, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), has recently appeared on the scene. In the present study, the exclusion power of both kinds of markers with regards to individual identification and parental analysis was directly compared in a Galloway cattle population. Seventeen bovine microsatellites were distributed in three incremental marker sets (10, 14 and 17 microsatellite markers) and used for cattle genotyping. A set of 43 bovine SNP was used for genotyping the same cattle population. The accuracy of both kinds of markers in individual identification was evaluated using probability of identity estimations. These were 2.4 × 10-8 for the 10 microsatellite set, 2.3 × 10-11 for the 14 microsatellite set, and 1.4 × 10-13 for the 17 microsatellite marker set. For the 43 SNP markers, the estimated probability of identity was 5.3 × 10-11. The exclusion power of both kinds of markers in parental analysis was evaluated using paternity exclusion estimations, and, in addition to this, by estimation of the parental exclusion probability in 18 Galloway family trios. Paternity exclusion was estimated to be over 99% for microsatellites, and approx. 98% for SNP. Both, microsatellite and SNP sets of markers showed similar parental exclusion probabilities.
KW - Exclusion Power
KW - Microsatellite
KW - Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24344509836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/znc-2005-7-821
DO - 10.1515/znc-2005-7-821
M3 - Article
C2 - 16163842
AN - SCOPUS:24344509836
SN - 0939-5075
VL - 60
SP - 637
EP - 643
JO - Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung - Section C Journal of Biosciences
JF - Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung - Section C Journal of Biosciences
IS - 7-8
ER -