Comparison of key aroma compounds in cooked brown rice varieties based on aroma extract dilution analyses

Magnus Jezussek, Bienvenido O. Juliano, Peter Schieberle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

182 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aroma compounds present in cooked brown rice of the three varieties Improved Malagkit Sungsong (IMS), Basmati 370 (B 370), and Khaskhani (KK), and of the variety Indica (German supermarket sample), were identified on the basis of aroma extract dilution analyses (AEDA). A total of 41 odor-active compounds were identified, of which eleven are reported for the first time as rice constituents. 2-Amino acetophenone (medicinal, phenolic), which was up to now unknown in rice aroma, exhibited the highest flavor dilution (FD) factor among the 30 to 39 odor-active compounds detected in all four varieties. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline, exhibiting an intense popcorn-like aroma-note, was confirmed as a further key aroma constituent in IMS, B 370, and KK, but was not important in Indica. Differences in the FD factors between the varieties were found for the previously unknown rice aroma compound 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5H)-furanone (Sotolon; seasoning-like), which was higher in B 370 than in IMS and KK. In IMS, a yet unknown, spicy smelling component with a very high FD factor could be detected, which contributed with lower FD factors to the overall aromas of B 370 and KK, and was not present in Indica. The latter variety, which was available on the German market, differed most in its overall aroma from the three Asian brown rices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1101-1105
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of agricultural and food chemistry
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Feb 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline
  • 2-amino acetophenone
  • Aroma extract dilution analysis
  • Rice aroma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of key aroma compounds in cooked brown rice varieties based on aroma extract dilution analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this