Comparison of immunochemical and HPLC-determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in groundwater samples of a former manufactured gas plant site

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Groundwater contamination and PAH-removal with a special water purification facility were monitored over several months by a PAH-immunoassay as well as by HPLC. In the enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) a polyclonal rabbit antiserum was applied. As test format an indirect competitive microtiter plate assay was used. The water samples could be directly measured without any extraction and purification steps. With the ELISA, the limit value for the sum of PAHs of 0.2 ppb as set by the German Drinking Water Act was certainly reached. Including 114 samples no false negative (defined as a measured concentration below 0.2 ppb) but 20 (17.5%) false positive (defined as a measured concentration above 0.2 ppb) samples were found with the immunoassay. Supposing the immunochemical results to be approximate values of the total PAH concentration then these data correlate very well (r equals 0.82, n equals 114) with the sum of the 16 EPA PAHs as measured by HPLC in this study. Therefore, the ELISA could be used as a rapid screening technique to diminish the sample number for HPLC.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
EditorsTuan Vo-Dinh
Pages531-538
Number of pages8
StatePublished - 1995
EventEnvironmental Monitoring and Hazardous Waste Site Remediation - Munich, Ger
Duration: 19 Jun 199521 Jun 1995

Publication series

NameProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume2504
ISSN (Print)0277-786X

Conference

ConferenceEnvironmental Monitoring and Hazardous Waste Site Remediation
CityMunich, Ger
Period19/06/9521/06/95

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of immunochemical and HPLC-determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in groundwater samples of a former manufactured gas plant site'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this