Comparison of Gaussian and Indicator Based Sequential Simulation Methods for 3D Spatial Uncertainty Quantification in Subsoil Modeling Using Cone Penetration Tests

Andreas Witty, Andrés A. Peña-Olarte, Roberto Cudmani

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The simplicity and efficiency of the cone penetration test (CPT) for geotechnical investigation makes it one of the most commonly accepted as well as one of the most employed in situ testing methods worldwide. To predict the most probable soil types and their corresponding spatial uncertainty from CPTs, two geostatistical methods, the Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGSIM) and Sequential Indicator Simulation (SISIM), are applied in a case study. Hereby, three dimensional (3D) models of the soil behavior index are calculated from the cone penetration resistance and skin friction. The CPTs were carried out to investigate the foundation of a dam in a pre-alpine valley filled with alluvial gravelly to sandy and clayey sediments. The case study demonstrates the ability of the proposed approaches to estimate the spatially distributed uncertainty of soil classification based on CPTs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-422
Number of pages9
JournalGeotechnical Special Publication
Volume2023-July
Issue numberGSP 345
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023
EventGeo-Risk Conference 2023: Innovation in Data and Analysis Methods - Arlington, United States
Duration: 23 Jul 202326 Jul 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Gaussian and Indicator Based Sequential Simulation Methods for 3D Spatial Uncertainty Quantification in Subsoil Modeling Using Cone Penetration Tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this