Abstract
Demodulation techniques for the multiple accessing scheme Code Time Division Multiple Access are compared. To simplify the demodulator it is divided into two parts, a despreader and a user separator. For despreading it is shown that a sequence aperiodic inverse filter is preferred over the sequence matched filter. For user separation the performance of a channel matched filter, a decision-feedback equalizer, linear minimum-mean square error filters, the hard-output Viterbi Algorithm and the Forward-Backward Algorithm are compared in terms of cut-off rate. The resulting curves quantify the performance improvement attained by using more powerful algorithms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 525-529 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| State | Published - 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Communications Theory Mini-Conference. Part 4 (of 4) - London, UK Duration: 18 Nov 1996 → 22 Nov 1996 |
Conference
| Conference | Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Communications Theory Mini-Conference. Part 4 (of 4) |
|---|---|
| City | London, UK |
| Period | 18/11/96 → 22/11/96 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of demodulation techniques for code time division multiple access'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver