TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between the Original-and a Standardized Version of a Physical Assessment Test for the Dorsal Chain-A Cohort-Based Cross Sectional Study
AU - Gabriel, Anna
AU - Paternoster, Florian Kurt
AU - Konrad, Andreas
AU - Horstmann, Thomas
AU - Pohl, Torsten
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2022).
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - This cohort-based cross-sectional study compares the original (OV) and a newly developed standardized version (SV) of the Bunkie Test, a physical test used to assess the dorsal chain mus-cles. Twenty-three participants (13 females, 10 males; median age of 26 ± 3 years) performed the test, a reverse plank, with one foot on a stool and the contralateral leg lifted. In the SV, the po-sition of the pelvis and the foot were predefined. The test performance time (s) and surface electromyography (sEMG) signals of the dorsal chain muscles were recorded. We performed a median power frequency (MPF) analysis, using short-time Fourier trans-formation, and calculated the MPF/time linear regression slope. We compared the slopes of the linear regression analysis (be-tween legs) and the performance times (between the OV and SV) with the Wilcoxon test. Performance times did not differ between SV and OV for either the dominant (p = 0.28) or non-dominant leg (p = 0.08). Linear regression analysis revealed a negative slope for the muscles of the tested leg and contralateral erector spinae, with a significant difference between the biceps femoris of the tested (-0.91 ± 1.08) and contralateral leg (0.01 ± 1.62) in the SV (p = 0.004). The sEMG showed a clearer pattern in the SV than in the OV. Hence, we recommend using the SV to assess the structures of the dorsal chain of the tested leg and contralateral back.
AB - This cohort-based cross-sectional study compares the original (OV) and a newly developed standardized version (SV) of the Bunkie Test, a physical test used to assess the dorsal chain mus-cles. Twenty-three participants (13 females, 10 males; median age of 26 ± 3 years) performed the test, a reverse plank, with one foot on a stool and the contralateral leg lifted. In the SV, the po-sition of the pelvis and the foot were predefined. The test performance time (s) and surface electromyography (sEMG) signals of the dorsal chain muscles were recorded. We performed a median power frequency (MPF) analysis, using short-time Fourier trans-formation, and calculated the MPF/time linear regression slope. We compared the slopes of the linear regression analysis (be-tween legs) and the performance times (between the OV and SV) with the Wilcoxon test. Performance times did not differ between SV and OV for either the dominant (p = 0.28) or non-dominant leg (p = 0.08). Linear regression analysis revealed a negative slope for the muscles of the tested leg and contralateral erector spinae, with a significant difference between the biceps femoris of the tested (-0.91 ± 1.08) and contralateral leg (0.01 ± 1.62) in the SV (p = 0.004). The sEMG showed a clearer pattern in the SV than in the OV. Hence, we recommend using the SV to assess the structures of the dorsal chain of the tested leg and contralateral back.
KW - Bunkie Test
KW - musculoskeletal diagnostics
KW - myofascial system
KW - physical performance test
KW - superficial backline
KW - surface electromyography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131881753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.52082/jssm.2022.182
DO - 10.52082/jssm.2022.182
M3 - Article
C2 - 35719223
AN - SCOPUS:85131881753
SN - 1303-2968
VL - 21
SP - 182
EP - 190
JO - Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
JF - Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
IS - 2
ER -