Abstract
The diagnostic performance of high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (1.5 T) for detection of liver metastases was compared with that of computed tomography (CT). All patients (n = 52) underwent preoperative screening for metastases by means of MR imaging with T1-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and T2-weighted pulse sequences and CT scanning with unenhanced, incremental dynamic bolus-enhanced, and delayed contrast medium-enhanced techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis in which 800 images (400 with and 400 without lesions) and five readers (4,000 observations) were used; images were obtained from patients (n = 39) in whom the same anatomic levels were available for all MR imaging and CT studies. Direct comparison between the best MR imaging technique (T2-weighted spin-echo imaging [repetition time, 2,000 msec; echo time, 70 msec]) and the best CT technique (incremental dynamic bolus CT) showed a strong trend of superiority of T2-weighted MR imaging over incremental dynamic bolus CT. No highly statistically significant difference (P ≥ .01), however, was found between these two techniques.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 879-886 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Radiology |
| Volume | 182 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1992 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies
- Gastrointestinal tract, neoplasms, 70.32
- Liver neoplasms, CT, 761.1211, 761.332
- Liver neoplasms, MR, 761.1214, 761.332
- Liver neoplasms, secondary, 761.332
- Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between high-field-strength MR imaging and CT for screening of hepatic metastases: A receiver operating characteristic analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver