TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between high-field-strength MR imaging and CT for screening of hepatic metastases
T2 - A receiver operating characteristic analysis
AU - Rummeny, Ernst J.
AU - Wernecke, Karl
AU - Saini, Sanjay
AU - Vassallo, Pierre
AU - Wiesmann, Werner
AU - Oestmann, Joerg W.
AU - Kivelitz, Dietmar
AU - Reers, Bernhard
AU - Reiser, Maximilian F.
AU - Peters, Peter E.
PY - 1992/3
Y1 - 1992/3
N2 - The diagnostic performance of high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (1.5 T) for detection of liver metastases was compared with that of computed tomography (CT). All patients (n = 52) underwent preoperative screening for metastases by means of MR imaging with T1-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and T2-weighted pulse sequences and CT scanning with unenhanced, incremental dynamic bolus-enhanced, and delayed contrast medium-enhanced techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis in which 800 images (400 with and 400 without lesions) and five readers (4,000 observations) were used; images were obtained from patients (n = 39) in whom the same anatomic levels were available for all MR imaging and CT studies. Direct comparison between the best MR imaging technique (T2-weighted spin-echo imaging [repetition time, 2,000 msec; echo time, 70 msec]) and the best CT technique (incremental dynamic bolus CT) showed a strong trend of superiority of T2-weighted MR imaging over incremental dynamic bolus CT. No highly statistically significant difference (P ≥ .01), however, was found between these two techniques.
AB - The diagnostic performance of high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (1.5 T) for detection of liver metastases was compared with that of computed tomography (CT). All patients (n = 52) underwent preoperative screening for metastases by means of MR imaging with T1-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and T2-weighted pulse sequences and CT scanning with unenhanced, incremental dynamic bolus-enhanced, and delayed contrast medium-enhanced techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis in which 800 images (400 with and 400 without lesions) and five readers (4,000 observations) were used; images were obtained from patients (n = 39) in whom the same anatomic levels were available for all MR imaging and CT studies. Direct comparison between the best MR imaging technique (T2-weighted spin-echo imaging [repetition time, 2,000 msec; echo time, 70 msec]) and the best CT technique (incremental dynamic bolus CT) showed a strong trend of superiority of T2-weighted MR imaging over incremental dynamic bolus CT. No highly statistically significant difference (P ≥ .01), however, was found between these two techniques.
KW - Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies
KW - Gastrointestinal tract, neoplasms, 70.32
KW - Liver neoplasms, CT, 761.1211, 761.332
KW - Liver neoplasms, MR, 761.1214, 761.332
KW - Liver neoplasms, secondary, 761.332
KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026569822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1535912
DO - 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1535912
M3 - Review article
C2 - 1535912
AN - SCOPUS:0026569822
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 182
SP - 879
EP - 886
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 3
ER -