Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps: A literature review

Armin Sharafi; Thomas Wolfenstetter; Petra Wolf; Helmut Krcmar

doi:10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575

Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps: A literature review

Armin Sharafi, Thomas Wolfenstetter, Petra Wolf, Helmut Krcmar

Informatics 17 - Chair of Information Systems and Business Process Management

Technical University of Munich

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper summarises international literature on product development from an engineering perspective to identify coverage and gaps in commonly used product development process models. As a result, we find a heterogeneous landscape of models describing the process. A comparative framework illustrating the emphasis and the scope of product development process models from different perspectives has been derived for our approach. This framework helps researchers and developers to identify suitable procedures for their specific perspective. Accordingly we discovered three areas (product development management, simultaneous development and information management) which are so far underrepresented in product development process models.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
Pages	1732-1736
Number of pages	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575
State	Published - 2010
Event	IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM2010 - Macao, China Duration: 7 Dec 2010 → 10 Dec 2010

Publication series

Name	IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Conference

Conference	IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM2010
Country/Territory	China
City	Macao
Period	7/12/10 → 10/12/10

Keywords

Design methodology
Process model
Product development

Access to Document

10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575

Cite this

Sharafi, A., Wolfenstetter, T., Wolf, P., & Krcmar, H. (2010). Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps: A literature review. In IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1732-1736). Article 5674575 (IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575

Sharafi, Armin ; Wolfenstetter, Thomas ; Wolf, Petra et al. / Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps : A literature review. IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 2010. pp. 1732-1736 (IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management).

@inproceedings{a82cc129a0fc44c0a15d5d71ad007ae1,

title = "Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps: A literature review",

abstract = "This paper summarises international literature on product development from an engineering perspective to identify coverage and gaps in commonly used product development process models. As a result, we find a heterogeneous landscape of models describing the process. A comparative framework illustrating the emphasis and the scope of product development process models from different perspectives has been derived for our approach. This framework helps researchers and developers to identify suitable procedures for their specific perspective. Accordingly we discovered three areas (product development management, simultaneous development and information management) which are so far underrepresented in product development process models.",

keywords = "Design methodology, Process model, Product development",

author = "Armin Sharafi and Thomas Wolfenstetter and Petra Wolf and Helmut Krcmar",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781424485031",

series = "IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management",

pages = "1732--1736",

booktitle = "IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management",

note = "IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM2010 ; Conference date: 07-12-2010 Through 10-12-2010",

}

Sharafi, A, Wolfenstetter, T, Wolf, P & Krcmar, H 2010, Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps: A literature review. in IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management., 5674575, IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1732-1736, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM2010, Macao, China, 7/12/10. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575

Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps: A literature review. / Sharafi, Armin; Wolfenstetter, Thomas; Wolf, Petra et al.
IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 2010. p. 1732-1736 5674575 (IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps

T2 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM2010

AU - Sharafi, Armin

AU - Wolfenstetter, Thomas

AU - Wolf, Petra

AU - Krcmar, Helmut

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper summarises international literature on product development from an engineering perspective to identify coverage and gaps in commonly used product development process models. As a result, we find a heterogeneous landscape of models describing the process. A comparative framework illustrating the emphasis and the scope of product development process models from different perspectives has been derived for our approach. This framework helps researchers and developers to identify suitable procedures for their specific perspective. Accordingly we discovered three areas (product development management, simultaneous development and information management) which are so far underrepresented in product development process models.

AB - This paper summarises international literature on product development from an engineering perspective to identify coverage and gaps in commonly used product development process models. As a result, we find a heterogeneous landscape of models describing the process. A comparative framework illustrating the emphasis and the scope of product development process models from different perspectives has been derived for our approach. This framework helps researchers and developers to identify suitable procedures for their specific perspective. Accordingly we discovered three areas (product development management, simultaneous development and information management) which are so far underrepresented in product development process models.

KW - Design methodology

KW - Process model

KW - Product development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751700154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575

DO - 10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:78751700154

SN - 9781424485031

T3 - IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

SP - 1732

EP - 1736

BT - IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Y2 - 7 December 2010 through 10 December 2010

ER -

Sharafi A, Wolfenstetter T, Wolf P, Krcmar H. Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps: A literature review. In IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 2010. p. 1732-1736. 5674575. (IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management). doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674575

Comparing product development models to identify process coverage and current gaps: A literature review

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this