TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing microfiltration-reverse osmosis and soil-aquifer treatment for indirect potable reuse of water
AU - Drewes, Jörg E.
AU - Reinhard, Martin
AU - Fox, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the technical and financial support received from the cities of Mesa (Arizona), Phoenix (Arizona), Tucson (Arizona), Riverside (California), and the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (California). Principal funding was also provided by the American Water Works Association Research Foundation (AWWARF), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the NATIONAL CENTERS for Water Treatment Technologies. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies. The authors thank the following individuals for their technical support: Michael Norris and Marilyn K. Hudson, US Bureau of Reclamation; Chris Baer and Ron Lopez, City of Mesa; Bill Vernon, City of Scottsdale; Dr. Stefan Huber, Karlsruhe; Anke Soellner and Aynur Sarikaya, Arizona State University; and W. John Montgomery-Brown, Stanford University.
PY - 2003/9
Y1 - 2003/9
N2 - Microfiltration (MF) followed by reverse osmosis (RO) and soil-aquifer treatment (SAT) are the two principal technologies considered for indirect potable reuse of wastewater. This study, conducted at the Northwest Water Reclamation Plant, Mesa (Arizona), evaluated MF/RO and SAT (>6 months residence time) treated tertiary effluent with respect to organics removal. Effluent organic matter was characterized as total organic carbon (TOC), by UV absorbance (UVA), solid-state carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and size exclusion chromatography. Several trace organic micropollutants, including EDTA, NTA, and alkylphenolethoxylate residues, were analyzed by GC/MS. The study revealed that final TOC concentrations of MF/RO and SAT are 0.3 and 1.0mgl-1, respectively. Based on the characterization techniques used, the character of bulk organics present in final SAT water resembles the character of natural organic matter present in drinking water. Depending on the molecular weight cut-off, RO membranes can efficiently reject high molecular weight organic matter (characterized as humic and fulvic acids). However, approximately 40-50 percent of the remaining TOC in permeates consists of low molecular weight acids and neutrals representing a molecular weight range of ∼500Da and less. In the SAT treated effluent, EDTA and APECs were removed to approximately 4.3 and 0.54μg/l, respectively, but were below the detection limit in the MF/RO treated effluent.
AB - Microfiltration (MF) followed by reverse osmosis (RO) and soil-aquifer treatment (SAT) are the two principal technologies considered for indirect potable reuse of wastewater. This study, conducted at the Northwest Water Reclamation Plant, Mesa (Arizona), evaluated MF/RO and SAT (>6 months residence time) treated tertiary effluent with respect to organics removal. Effluent organic matter was characterized as total organic carbon (TOC), by UV absorbance (UVA), solid-state carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and size exclusion chromatography. Several trace organic micropollutants, including EDTA, NTA, and alkylphenolethoxylate residues, were analyzed by GC/MS. The study revealed that final TOC concentrations of MF/RO and SAT are 0.3 and 1.0mgl-1, respectively. Based on the characterization techniques used, the character of bulk organics present in final SAT water resembles the character of natural organic matter present in drinking water. Depending on the molecular weight cut-off, RO membranes can efficiently reject high molecular weight organic matter (characterized as humic and fulvic acids). However, approximately 40-50 percent of the remaining TOC in permeates consists of low molecular weight acids and neutrals representing a molecular weight range of ∼500Da and less. In the SAT treated effluent, EDTA and APECs were removed to approximately 4.3 and 0.54μg/l, respectively, but were below the detection limit in the MF/RO treated effluent.
KW - Dissolved organic matter
KW - Indirect potable reuse
KW - Reverse osmosis
KW - Soil-aquifer treatment
KW - Water reuse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038350677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00230-6
DO - 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00230-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 12867327
AN - SCOPUS:0038350677
SN - 0043-1354
VL - 37
SP - 3612
EP - 3621
JO - Water Research
JF - Water Research
IS - 15
ER -