TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative analysis of different transection techniques in minor and major hepatic resections
T2 - A prospective cohort study
AU - Riediger, Carina
AU - Mueller, Michael W.
AU - Geismann, Florian
AU - Lehmann, Andreas
AU - Schuster, Tibor
AU - Michalski, Christoph W.
AU - Kuhn, Klaus
AU - Friess, Helmut
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Background: In liver surgery different transection techniques are available without clear evidence regarding indication and advantage for each technique. The aim of this study was to identify the most superior liver transection technique between the different techniques (stapler, water-jet and electrocautery). Comparative analyses were performed for minor and major hepatectomies. Methods: In a single-center study, all liver resections performed between July 2007 and July 2012 were prospectively recorded and analysed. Results: 366 liver resections were included according to predefined eligibility criteria. No clear benefit for one particular technique in minor or major hepatectomy could be shown. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed disadvantages for stapler-hepatectomies. However, minor hepatectomies were performed with significantly lower morbidity (p<0.001), lower operating time (p=0.001), fewer need of transfusion (p<0.0001) and shorter ICU stay (p=0.001) than major hepatectomies. Conclusions: If possible, minor hepatectomies should be chosen. Competing techniques, selected according to surgeon's preference, revealed no significant differences in primary outcome measures.
AB - Background: In liver surgery different transection techniques are available without clear evidence regarding indication and advantage for each technique. The aim of this study was to identify the most superior liver transection technique between the different techniques (stapler, water-jet and electrocautery). Comparative analyses were performed for minor and major hepatectomies. Methods: In a single-center study, all liver resections performed between July 2007 and July 2012 were prospectively recorded and analysed. Results: 366 liver resections were included according to predefined eligibility criteria. No clear benefit for one particular technique in minor or major hepatectomy could be shown. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed disadvantages for stapler-hepatectomies. However, minor hepatectomies were performed with significantly lower morbidity (p<0.001), lower operating time (p=0.001), fewer need of transfusion (p<0.0001) and shorter ICU stay (p=0.001) than major hepatectomies. Conclusions: If possible, minor hepatectomies should be chosen. Competing techniques, selected according to surgeon's preference, revealed no significant differences in primary outcome measures.
KW - Electrocautery
KW - Hepatectomy
KW - Liver transection techniques
KW - Stapler
KW - Water-jet
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887173158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.08.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.08.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 23994002
AN - SCOPUS:84887173158
SN - 1743-9191
VL - 11
SP - 826
EP - 833
JO - International Journal of Surgery
JF - International Journal of Surgery
IS - 9
ER -