Compact bidding languages and supplier selection for markets with economies of scale and scope

Martin Bichler, Stefan Schneider, Kemal Guler, Mehmet Sayal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Combinatorial auctions have been used in procurement markets with economies of scope. Preference elicitation is already a problem in single-unit combinatorial auctions, but it becomes prohibitive even for small instances of multi-unit combinatorial auctions, as suppliers cannot be expected to enumerate a sufficient number of bids that would allow an auctioneer to find the efficient allocation. Auction design for markets with economies of scale and scope are much less well understood. They require more compact and yet expressive bidding languages, and the supplier selection typically is a hard computational problem. In this paper, we propose a compact bidding language to express the characteristics of a supplier's cost function in markets with economies of scale and scope. Bidders in these auctions can specify various discounts and markups on overall spend on all items or selected item sets, and specify complex conditions for these pricing rules. We propose an optimization formulation to solve the resulting supplier selection problem and provide an extensive experimental evaluation. We also discuss the impact of different language features on the computational effort, on total spend, and the knowledge representation of the bids. Interestingly, while in most settings volume discount bids can lead to significant cost savings, some types of volume discount bids can be worse than split-award auctions in simple settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-77
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume214
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Auctions/bidding
  • Decision support systems
  • E-commerce

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Compact bidding languages and supplier selection for markets with economies of scale and scope'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this