Common trends and differences in antioxidant activity analysis of phenolic substances using single electron transfer based assays

Melanie Platzer, Sandra Kiese, Thomas Herfellner, Ute Schweiggert-Weisz, Oliver Miesbauer, Peter Eisner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

151 Scopus citations

Abstract

Numerous assays were developed to measure the antioxidant activity, but each has limitations and the results obtained by different methods are not always comparable. Popular examples are the DPPH and ABTS assay. Our aim was to study similarities and differences of these two assay regarding the measured antioxidant potentials of 24 phenolic compounds using the same measurement and evaluation methods. This should allow conclusions to be drawn as to whether one of the assays is more suitable for measuring specific subgroups like phenolic acids, flavonols, flavanones, dihydrochalcones or flavanols. The assays showed common trends for the mean values of most of the subgroups. Some dihydrochalcones and flavanones did not react with the DPPH radical in contrast to the ABTS radical, leading to significant differences. Therefore, to determine the antioxidant potential of dihydrochalcone or flavanone-rich extracts, the ABTS assay should be preferred. We found that the results of the flavonoids in the DPPH assay were dependent on the Bors criteria, whereas the structure-activity relationship in the ABTS assay was not clear. For the phenolic acids, the results in the ABTS assay were only high for pyrogallol structures, while the DPPH assay was mainly determined by the number of OH groups.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1244
JournalMolecules
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antioxidant capacity
  • Flavonoids
  • Phenolic acids
  • Reaction kinetics
  • Stoichiometry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Common trends and differences in antioxidant activity analysis of phenolic substances using single electron transfer based assays'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this