Abstract
We comment on a recent article [Comput. Mech. 2020, 65, 487–502] about surface-tension modeling for free-surface flows with Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. The authors motivate part of their work related to a novel principal curvature approximation by the wrong claim that the classical curvature formulation in SPH overestimates the curvature in 3D by a factor of 2. In this note we confirm the correctness of the classical formulation and point out the misconception of the commented article.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1067-1068 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Computational Mechanics |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2022 |
Keywords
- Curvature
- Free-surface
- SPH
- Surface-tension
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on “Free surface tension in incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (ISPH)” [Comput. Mech. 2020, 65, 487–502]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver