Abstract
Background: The aim was to assess the clinical relevance of the World Health Organization and tumour node metastasis (TNM) classifications in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs). Methods: Prospectively collected data from 118 consecutive patients with a pNET receiving surgical intervention were analysed. Results: Forty-one patients had well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, 64 had well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas and 13 had poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Five-year survival rates were 95, 44 and 0 per cent respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in survival after R0 and R1/R2 resections in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas (P = 0.905). In those with well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, any resection and having a clinically non-functional tumour significantly increased survival (P = 0.003 and P = 0.037 respectively). The TNM stage was I in 37 patients, II in 15 patients, III in 32 patients and IV in 34 patients. There were significant differences in 5-year survival between stage I and II (88 and 85 per cent respectively) and stage HI and IV (31 and 42 per cent respectively) (P = 0.010). Conclusion: Both classifications accurately reflect the clinical outcome of patients with pNET. The resection status may not be critical for long-term survival in patients with pNET.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 627-635 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | British Journal of Surgery |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |