TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
T2 - results of the EU-CERT-ICD controlled multicentre cohort study
AU - EU-CERT-ICD Study Investigators
AU - Zabel, Markus
AU - Willems, Rik
AU - Lubinski, Andrzej
AU - Bauer, Axel
AU - Brugada, Josep
AU - Conen, David
AU - Flevari, Panagiota
AU - Hasenfuß, Gerd
AU - Svetlosak, Martin
AU - Huikuri, Heikki V.
AU - Malik, Marek
AU - Pavlovic, Nikola
AU - Schmidt, Georg
AU - Sritharan, Rajevaa
AU - Schlögl, Simon
AU - Szavits-Nossan, Janko
AU - Traykov, Vassil
AU - Tuinenburg, Anton E.
AU - Willich, Stefan N.
AU - Harden, Markus
AU - Friede, Tim
AU - Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup
AU - Sticherling, Christian
AU - Merkely, Béla
AU - Perge, Peter
AU - Sallo, Zoltan
AU - Szeplaki, Gabor
AU - Szegedi, Nandor
AU - Nagy, Klaudia Vivien
AU - Lüthje, Lars
AU - Sritharan, Rajeeva
AU - Haarmann, Helge
AU - Bergau, Leonard
AU - Seegers, Joachim
AU - Munoz-Exposito, Pascal
AU - Tichelbäcker, Tobias
AU - Kirova, Aleksandra
AU - Hnatkova, Katerina
AU - Vos, Marc A.
AU - Reinhold, Thomas
AU - Vandenberk, Bert
AU - Rotkvic, L.
AU - Katsimardos, Andreas
AU - Katsaras, Dimitrios
AU - Hatala, Robert
AU - Kuczejko, Tomasz
AU - Hansen, Jim
AU - Manola, Sime
AU - Vinter, Ozren
AU - Benko, Ivica
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2020/9/21
Y1 - 2020/9/21
N2 - Aims The EUropean Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (EU-CERT-ICD), a prospective investigator-initiated, controlled cohort study, was conducted in 44 centres and 15 European countries. It aimed to assess current clinical effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy. Methods We recruited 2327 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and guideline and results indications for prophylactic ICD implantation. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Clinical characteristics, medications, resting, and 12-lead Holter electrocardiograms (ECGs) were documented at enrolment baseline. Baseline and follow-up (FU) data from 2247 patients were analysable, 1516 patients before first ICD implantation (ICD group) and 731 patients without ICD serving as controls. Multivariable models and propensity scoring for adjustment were used to compare the two groups for mortality. During mean FU of 2.4 ± 1.1 years, 342 deaths occurred (6.3%/years annualized mortality, 5.6%/years in the ICD group vs. 9.2%/years in controls), favouring ICD treatment [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.682, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.537–0.865, P = 0.0016]. Multivariable mortality predictors included age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association class _75 years (adjusted HR 1.063, P = 0.8206, P for interaction = 0.0902). Conclusion In contemporary ICM/DCM patients (LVEF <_35%, narrow QRS), primary prophylactic ICD treatment was associated with a 27% lower mortality after adjustment. There appear to be patients with less survival advantage, such as older patients or diabetics.
AB - Aims The EUropean Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (EU-CERT-ICD), a prospective investigator-initiated, controlled cohort study, was conducted in 44 centres and 15 European countries. It aimed to assess current clinical effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy. Methods We recruited 2327 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and guideline and results indications for prophylactic ICD implantation. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Clinical characteristics, medications, resting, and 12-lead Holter electrocardiograms (ECGs) were documented at enrolment baseline. Baseline and follow-up (FU) data from 2247 patients were analysable, 1516 patients before first ICD implantation (ICD group) and 731 patients without ICD serving as controls. Multivariable models and propensity scoring for adjustment were used to compare the two groups for mortality. During mean FU of 2.4 ± 1.1 years, 342 deaths occurred (6.3%/years annualized mortality, 5.6%/years in the ICD group vs. 9.2%/years in controls), favouring ICD treatment [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.682, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.537–0.865, P = 0.0016]. Multivariable mortality predictors included age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association class _75 years (adjusted HR 1.063, P = 0.8206, P for interaction = 0.0902). Conclusion In contemporary ICM/DCM patients (LVEF <_35%, narrow QRS), primary prophylactic ICD treatment was associated with a 27% lower mortality after adjustment. There appear to be patients with less survival advantage, such as older patients or diabetics.
KW - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
KW - Mortality
KW - Risk factors
KW - Sudden cardiac death
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088901766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa226
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa226
M3 - Article
C2 - 32372094
AN - SCOPUS:85088901766
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 41
SP - 3437
EP - 3447
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 36
ER -